Log In or Register
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

Mail: Thanks from the Poe family

The world’s worst weapons

More opinion

Ag News

Guest opinion: Ethanol policy and the economy

UNL hosts climate agriculture workshop Nov. 19 in Holdrege

More Ag News


Email Article | Print Article
Opinion - Opinion
 
Mail: Limit ag subsidiesTell North Platte what you think
 
Courtesy Photo­Image
Kevin Raun

The Senate is debating their version of the 2013 Farm Bill this week, and all of us need to make our voices heard.

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

Here is the deal - I'm Kevin Rahn, and as a career farmer in Nebraska, I have been a participant in a wide range of farm programs over the years. They each came with varying goals and objectives.

The current shift in philosophy toward crop insurance premium subsidies has me worried.

Crop insurance is a good product that I have used for the past 30 years. However, I am wary of the cost of this subsidy to the US treasury the last three or four years, and the benefit it gives farmers, particularly the very large producers. Since crop insurance subsidies now make up the largest expense to the federal government under the farm program, this is a major issue.

Currently, there is no limit to the benefits one farming entity can qualify for regarding federal crop insurance premium subsidies. I could theoretically farm every acre in my county, or state for that matter, and the USDA would pay 60% of my federal crop insurance premium. That would be millions of dollars to one farmer. Does this sound sensible? Ironically, as the grain prices go up, the premium for crop insurance also goes up, obligating the US Treasury for an even larger expense.

There is a proposal now before the Senate in Washington to add common sense limits to the crop insurance premium subsidies per farm entity and to make sure they go to actively engaged farmers, like most other program benefits. It is a bipartisan amendment sponsored by Sen. Shaheen, a Democrat, and Sen. Toomey, a Republican.

Will you join me and call your senators today? Tell them to support the Shaheen-Toomey amendment #926 that will cap premium subsidies and ensure they go to working farmers and not passive investors. Find your senators by clicking here and selecting your state.

Both of your senators will have a vote. Please add your voice to the debate today.


Kevin Raun, Minden, Farmer and proud supporter of the Center for Rural Affairs


Like this story to send to your facebook

The North Platte Bulletin - Published 6/5/2013
Copyright © 2013 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 
 
Login to post Talk Back
Close


Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 

Copyright © 2003 - 2014 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 54.237.98.229
North Platte, Nebraska