Log In | Register   
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

Legislature: Retirement plan needs revisions

Why I ride a motorcycle

More opinion

Ag News

Johanns opposes Farm Bill as 'costly, gimmick-laden'

Livestock judging clinic set

More Ag News


   
Email Article | Print Article
News - Local News
 
Malmkar sent to prison for homicide Tell North Platte what you think
 
Courtesy Photo­Image
Michael Malmkar

In an emotionally charged courtroom, Michael Malmkar, 22, of North Platte, was sentenced Monday to up to 10 years imprisonment for motor vehicle homicide and leaving the scene of an injury accident.

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

Trouble began for Malmkar June 17, 2011 when he hit and killed bicyclist Levern Allan Walter, 56, while driving on State Farm Road on the south side of North Platte. Alcohol was suspected to be a factor.

Malmkar later underwent treatment in Lincoln for alcohol and drug abuse, but near the end of his treatment he burglarized a restaurant while living in a halfway house.

He has been jailed in Lincoln County since January 2012.

He stood before Lincoln County District Judge Donald Rowlands Monday to face sentencing in the death of Walters.

About 20 family members of the victim sat in the first three rows of the courtroom.

Before sentencing, defense attorney Robert Lindemeier asked the court to consider that this was not deliberate act, but an “irresponsible and negligent act by a scared young man.”

Lindemeier noted that Malmkar was an Eagle Scout.

“He’s a good kid that made a terrible mistake,” Lindemeier said. “It haunts him every day and you really should sentence him as a person.”

Lindemeier cited a past accident involving police officers in which two were killed and the responsible driver was only sentenced to probation.

“This does not call for the maximum sentence,” Lindemeier said. “Michael was scared and took off from the scene. He later came in and told police all that had happened.”

Lindemeier spoke about Malmkar’s prior offenses and said he definitely has an alcohol problem, but said that Malmkar is a responsible person at core.

“He will do something and then later take full responsibility for it,” Lindemeier said.

He asked for minimum sentences for the crimes, and that they be served concurrently (at the same time.)

Lindemeier also asked Rowlands to take note of several letters that were written to the court, supporting Malmkar.

Lincoln County Attorney Rebecca Harling made no comment.

When it was time for sentencing, Rowlands told Malmkar “this is an obviously a tragic case.”

“It’s the result of your bad judgment that this resulted in a tragic accident in which someone out for a bicycle ride ended up dead,” Rowland said. “Had you come before me today showing you had completed treatment and with good evaluations, a lesser sentence could be considered.”

“Your prior record and the incidents after your arrest on this does not make probation appropriate,” Rowland said. “That would send the wrong message to the public -- that one can commit something like this and only get probation.”

Rowlands sentenced Malmkar to 4-5 years on the motor vehicle homicide and 2-5 years for leaving the scene. The sentences will run consecutively, so Malmkar faces 6-10 years.

Malmkar was credited for a year and 17 days that he has already served.

Lindemeier appeared dejected and exhausted after the sentence was pronounced. He moved off by himself in the courtroom, removed his glasses and rubbed his face.

On the other hand, Walter family members also reacted negatively, often shaking their heads while Rowlands spelled out the sentence.

Roberta Walter, the wife of Levern, started to speak but court officials did not allow it. She left the court room in tears and other family members followed, seemingly angry.

Even though prisoners usually remain in court for other cases, this time Malmkar was removed from the courtroom by jailers promptly after sentencing.


Like this story to send to your facebook

The North Platte Bulletin - Published 2/25/2013
Copyright © 2013 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
For clarification, he did serve jail time.
+13
Posted by Yoda    - 2/27/2013 8:20:52 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

SRW: I absolutely was not excusing Houpt's actions! In fact, I said that I thought he deserved jail time! Yoda is completely right in that different circumstances warrant different sentences. The Houpt case was not a good case for Lindemeier to compare this to, because even though someone ended up dead in both cases, the circumstances were completely different.
+25
Posted by futuredr    - 2/27/2013 2:47:27 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

It does seem a wee bit myopic, and not very well thought out to suggest that results, and results alone should determine the outcome. A suggestion that a person who kills another should be treated just like those who came before, and who will come after, without an examination of the actual facts, and a basic understanding of human interaction and responsibility, is misguided from the start. From our history, it would suggest that this person should be treated just like Daniel Losinger, or Charles Moses. Both of these people killed others afterall. A laughable concept. Interestingly enough, when the acual facts of cases are examined, people may actually discover that the police officer was treated very similarly to another person who comitted a similar/same offense a few years prior. Likewise, Mr. Malmkar was treated similarly to another individual who comitted a similar offense...killing someone who was not a passenger. So, if people would take the time to understand the varying degree of crimes such as this, and the facts surrounding them, they may actually see that people are being treated similarly. I think Lindemeir's comparison of this case to the other was bad from the start, the cases and facts of them are not similar, only the charges are. Suggesting that the outcome of the conviction should based solely on the charge is simplistic, and just not well thought out. But, never mind facts getting in the way of belief. Sure, a discussion of whether the sentences for fact similar crimes should be more severe or less based on opinion can be had. But suggestions, both from a defense attorney (it is his job) and others that this case was similar to other cases (that factually were not the same) is delusional and uninformed.
+41
Posted by Yoda    - 2/27/2013 12:38:31 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Well to give "are you kidding?" some credit for their reading skills, the name Houpt never was mentioned.....

I'm on the fence with Malmkar's sentence. I agree that he needs to do time for what he's done, but at the same time I can see this prison sentence being more of a chance for him to hone his skills as a criminal. Right now he's just a petty thief with substance abuse problems who killed someone, but when he gets out what if he is worse?
+11
Posted by Mike    - 2/27/2013 12:09:29 PM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

"Lindemeier cited a past accident involving police officers in which two were killed and the responsible driver was only sentenced to probation."

Your reading skills need work...

0
Posted by SRW    - 2/27/2013 10:00:52 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

I have read, reread and re reread this article and not in one place have I noticed the name Houpt. Someone's got a bug in the backside over this. Stay on point and quite comparing cases about which you know little except what you have concocted in your fevered mind. By the way I don't expect you to actually do that.
-1
Posted by are you kidding?    - 2/27/2013 9:58:29 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

@futuredr: While you are excusing Houpt's actions; why not put some blame Malmkar's victim? They knew the dangers of riding their bike on the streets, so aren't they partly responsible too?

I do not put any blame on the Houpt victims. The driver of the vehicle is always 100% responsible, regardless of the competency, sobriety, or behavior, of the passengers.

It is complete and utter nonsense to put any of it on the victims.

-39
Posted by SRW    - 2/27/2013 9:43:43 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

Should be "because".
-3
Posted by usetolivethere    - 2/27/2013 8:43:37 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

To all the great legal minds bashing the County Attorney for saying nothing, you do realize that Judge has his mind made up long before court started. You realize there is a presentance investigation and the County Attorney has very little input. Just becuase you watch Law & Order weekly and the "DA" gets up and rambles on about the sentence, doesn't mean that happens in the real world.
+8
Posted by usetolivethere    - 2/27/2013 8:42:49 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

It haunts him everyday??? It must not jaunt him too much, you are in re-hab and placeed in the halfway house and you burglarize a business?? What happened was the deceased chasing you and you were trying to escape??? You are a grown man and making terrible decisions, time to pay for your crimes, I do NOT feel sorry for you at all!!! You had the opportunity to turn your life around and wasted it. The problem is prison is going to make you a more hardened criminal, will be sad to see the day you are released and repeat crime you will be committing. So very sad
+14
Posted by saywhat, too    - 2/27/2013 7:16:25 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Yeah, these are definitely far different circumstances!! Houpt was a police officer, someone who should have been very aware of the possible consequences of his driving drunk, someone sworn to uphold the law. He should have been held to a far HIGHER standard.
+7
Posted by fieldtech    - 2/27/2013 6:36:16 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

SRW: Yes, I agreed with you that Houpt should have gone to prison! But, can you really say that these situations are the same? How can a reasonable person say that Houpt's victims aren't partly responsible for what happened? His two victims, with as tragic as it was, weren't completely innocent. When Mr. Walter died while on a bike ride, he was completely innocent.
+47
Posted by futuredr    - 2/26/2013 11:52:49 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

How people can excuse the actions of one individual and condemn similar acts by another is a mystery to me. Malmkar killed a person, Houpt killed two people, both should be in prison. Yet, some people are actually laying blame on Houpt's victims for their own deaths, rather pathetic. The driver is ALWAYS 100% responsible, period.
-143
Posted by SRW    - 2/26/2013 5:18:16 PM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

crpflr - I see the irony in that as well.
+19
Posted by simplysaying    - 2/26/2013 3:20:54 PM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

Take a life, give up your own. Period. Should be an execution every time.
+25
Posted by crpflr    - 2/26/2013 3:17:06 PM
(0 current warnings - 16 warnings total)

I like how a certain someone on here can comment about what anyone deserves for a crime after defending the so called man who shot and killed my neice's mother a few years back....PUKE
+19
Posted by crpflr    - 2/26/2013 3:14:53 PM
(0 current warnings - 16 warnings total)

I agree with 'simplysaying.' This case is competely different than the Houpt case, in the fact that Houpt's buddies were drinking with him and chose to get in the vehicle with him and go booze cruising. So, they bear partial responsibility also. But, this man that Michael killed was completely innocent. I do believe Houpt should have gotten jail time, but these are still two completely different cases.
+34
Posted by futuredr    - 2/26/2013 12:11:48 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

I agree with MichealA once again Rebecca Harling has nothing to say.If she can not do her job,why is she here? How many times are we going to see the joke of a job she is doing and let it go? I think she may be afraid to go to trial.So lets just have everyone say they are sorry and let them go.
+37
Posted by mom10    - 2/26/2013 11:09:03 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Not to lessen the loss of life in the case that you are sighting SRW, but the people that officer killed were out drinking with him. Made the choice to get in the car with him behind the wheel and unfortunately both their choices and the choice of that officer to drive resulted in the loss of their lives. In Malmkar's case, this was a man out for a bike ride, he had not made a choice to put his life at risk. There is a difference.
+64
Posted by simplysaying    - 2/26/2013 9:21:53 AM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

A good kid? A good kid? He is twenty two and already committed two serious felonies with one dead body? Let him out when he is thirty and he will kill/rob again.
+31
Posted by are you kidding?    - 2/26/2013 8:56:57 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

it should haunt him.to hit someone and leave with not helping the victim at all.he was worried about his own skin and look where that got him he didn't get away with it.maybe if he aided that poor family he wouldn't feel so convicted.to loose someone at someone else doing, that's horrible.we've all done things "wrong" but it's how we deal with it, do we hide or show ourselves.
+17
Posted by 4thelaw    - 2/26/2013 8:11:56 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

A 6-10 year sentence for his crimes is not unreasonable, however it is excessive when previous cases are considered.

Former officer Houpt killed two people while driving drunk, and received probation.

Malmkar should appeal his sentencing.

-61
Posted by SRW    - 2/26/2013 8:06:36 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

"Good Kid", what a joke. He kills a man, flees, the scene, goes to Alcohol treatment, robs a restaurant, and smoke bung hole weed in jail and all this = good kid. Mr. Lindemeier, I know you are an attorney but come one, did you really expect anyone to buy that line of garbage?
+46
Posted by PB    - 2/26/2013 6:50:10 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

6-10 sound fair considering he keeps re-offending. To set the record straight, he never violated parole because parole happens AFTER you are released from prison. He may have violated the terms of his bond.
+9
Posted by tiger4    - 2/26/2013 6:30:28 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

My thoughts and prayers for both sides in this situation.
+25
Posted by NPNative    - 2/25/2013 9:56:33 PM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

A tragedy, hopefully a lasting lesson about living in the fast lane. Prayers to everyone involved.
+18
Posted by original    - 2/25/2013 9:20:40 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Our justice system is a complete joke. I loved the part where it said Rebecca Harling made no comment. This guy violates parole while he was in Lincoln, then gets caught with weed while in jail in North Platte and she has no comment. Why are we paying this lady? Maybe justice will come to him in Lincoln.
+45
Posted by MichaelA    - 2/25/2013 8:31:04 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Haunts him? Really? He had ,like the judge said, a chance to make changes ,but didn't care enough to.If he wanted to take responsibility for his actions , he should of stood and confessed and asked for the maximum sentence.
+27
Posted by meangirl    - 2/25/2013 6:45:22 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back

Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 


Copyright © 2003 - 2013 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 50.17.109.248
North Platte, Nebraska