|
For clarification, he did serve jail time. |
|
+13
|
Posted by Yoda - 2/27/2013 8:20:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
SRW: I absolutely was not excusing Houpt's actions! In fact, I said that I thought he deserved jail time!
Yoda is completely right in that different circumstances warrant different sentences.
The Houpt case was not a good case for Lindemeier to compare this to, because even though someone ended up dead in both cases, the circumstances were completely different. |
|
+25
|
Posted by futuredr - 2/27/2013 2:47:27 PM
|
|
|
It does seem a wee bit myopic, and not very well thought out to suggest that results, and results alone should determine the outcome. A suggestion that a person who kills another should be treated just like those who came before, and who will come after, without an examination of the actual facts, and a basic understanding of human interaction and responsibility, is misguided from the start. From our history, it would suggest that this person should be treated just like Daniel Losinger, or Charles Moses. Both of these people killed others afterall. A laughable concept. Interestingly enough, when the acual facts of cases are examined, people may actually discover that the police officer was treated very similarly to another person who comitted a similar/same offense a few years prior. Likewise, Mr. Malmkar was treated similarly to another individual who comitted a similar offense...killing someone who was not a passenger. So, if people would take the time to understand the varying degree of crimes such as this, and the facts surrounding them, they may actually see that people are being treated similarly. I think Lindemeir's comparison of this case to the other was bad from the start, the cases and facts of them are not similar, only the charges are. Suggesting that the outcome of the conviction should based solely on the charge is simplistic, and just not well thought out. But, never mind facts getting in the way of belief. Sure, a discussion of whether the sentences for fact similar crimes should be more severe or less based on opinion can be had. But suggestions, both from a defense attorney (it is his job) and others that this case was similar to other cases (that factually were not the same) is delusional and uninformed. |
|
+41
|
Posted by Yoda - 2/27/2013 12:38:31 PM
|
|
Well to give "are you kidding?" some credit for their reading skills, the name Houpt never was mentioned.....
I'm on the fence with Malmkar's sentence. I agree that he needs to do time for what he's done, but at the same time I can see this prison sentence being more of a chance for him to hone his skills as a criminal. Right now he's just a petty thief with substance abuse problems who killed someone, but when he gets out what if he is worse? |
|
+11
|
Posted by Mike - 2/27/2013 12:09:29 PM
|
|
|
"Lindemeier cited a past accident involving police officers in which two were killed and the responsible driver was only sentenced to probation."
Your reading skills need work... |
|
0
|
Posted by SRW - 2/27/2013 10:00:52 AM
|
|
|
I have read, reread and re reread this article and not in one place have I noticed the name Houpt. Someone's got a bug in the backside over this. Stay on point and quite comparing cases about which you know little except what you have concocted in your fevered mind. By the way I don't expect you to actually do that. |
|
-1
|
Posted by are you kidding? - 2/27/2013 9:58:29 AM
|
|
|
@futuredr: While you are excusing Houpt's actions; why not put some blame Malmkar's victim? They knew the dangers of riding their bike on the streets, so aren't they partly responsible too?
I do not put any blame on the Houpt victims. The driver of the vehicle is always 100% responsible, regardless of the competency, sobriety, or behavior, of the passengers.
It is complete and utter nonsense to put any of it on the victims. |
|
-39
|
Posted by SRW - 2/27/2013 9:43:43 AM
|
|
|
Should be "because". |
|
-3
|
Posted by usetolivethere - 2/27/2013 8:43:37 AM
|
|
|
To all the great legal minds bashing the County Attorney for saying nothing, you do realize that Judge has his mind made up long before court started. You realize there is a presentance investigation and the County Attorney has very little input. Just becuase you watch Law & Order weekly and the "DA" gets up and rambles on about the sentence, doesn't mean that happens in the real world. |
|
+8
|
Posted by usetolivethere - 2/27/2013 8:42:49 AM
|
|
|
It haunts him everyday??? It must not jaunt him too much, you are in re-hab and placeed in the halfway house and you burglarize a business?? What happened was the deceased chasing you and you were trying to escape??? You are a grown man and making terrible decisions, time to pay for your crimes, I do NOT feel sorry for you at all!!! You had the opportunity to turn your life around and wasted it. The problem is prison is going to make you a more hardened criminal, will be sad to see the day you are released and repeat crime you will be committing. So very sad |
|
+14
|
Posted by saywhat, too - 2/27/2013 7:16:25 AM
|
|
|
Yeah, these are definitely far different circumstances!! Houpt was a police officer, someone who should have been very aware of the possible consequences of his driving drunk, someone sworn to uphold the law. He should have been held to a far HIGHER standard. |
|
+7
|
Posted by fieldtech - 2/27/2013 6:36:16 AM
|
|
|
SRW: Yes, I agreed with you that Houpt should have gone to prison! But, can you really say that these situations are the same? How can a reasonable person say that Houpt's victims aren't partly responsible for what happened? His two victims, with as tragic as it was, weren't completely innocent. When Mr. Walter died while on a bike ride, he was completely innocent. |
|
+47
|
Posted by futuredr - 2/26/2013 11:52:49 PM
|
|
|
How people can excuse the actions of one individual and condemn similar acts by another is a mystery to me. Malmkar killed a person, Houpt killed two people, both should be in prison. Yet, some people are actually laying blame on Houpt's victims for their own deaths, rather pathetic. The driver is ALWAYS 100% responsible, period. |
|
-143
|
Posted by SRW - 2/26/2013 5:18:16 PM
|
|
|
crpflr - I see the irony in that as well. |
|
+19
|
Posted by simplysaying - 2/26/2013 3:20:54 PM
|
|
|
Take a life, give up your own. Period. Should be an execution every time. |
|
+25
|
Posted by crpflr - 2/26/2013 3:17:06 PM
|
|
|
I like how a certain someone on here can comment about what anyone deserves for a crime after defending the so called man who shot and killed my neice's mother a few years back....PUKE |
|
+19
|
Posted by crpflr - 2/26/2013 3:14:53 PM
|
|
|
I agree with 'simplysaying.' This case is competely different than the Houpt case, in the fact that Houpt's buddies were drinking with him and chose to get in the vehicle with him and go booze cruising. So, they bear partial responsibility also. But, this man that Michael killed was completely innocent. I do believe Houpt should have gotten jail time, but these are still two completely different cases. |
|
+34
|
Posted by futuredr - 2/26/2013 12:11:48 PM
|
|
|
I agree with MichealA once again Rebecca Harling has nothing to say.If she can not do her job,why is she here? How many times are we going to see the joke of a job she is doing and let it go? I think she may be afraid to go to trial.So lets just have everyone say they are sorry and let them go. |
|
+37
|
Posted by mom10 - 2/26/2013 11:09:03 AM
|
|
|
Not to lessen the loss of life in the case that you are sighting SRW, but the people that officer killed were out drinking with him. Made the choice to get in the car with him behind the wheel and unfortunately both their choices and the choice of that officer to drive resulted in the loss of their lives. In Malmkar's case, this was a man out for a bike ride, he had not made a choice to put his life at risk. There is a difference.
|
|
+64
|
Posted by simplysaying - 2/26/2013 9:21:53 AM
|
|
|
A good kid? A good kid? He is twenty two and already committed two serious felonies with one dead body? Let him out when he is thirty and he will kill/rob again. |
|
+31
|
Posted by are you kidding? - 2/26/2013 8:56:57 AM
|
|
|
it should haunt him.to hit someone and leave with not helping the victim at all.he was worried about his own skin and look where that got him he didn't get away with it.maybe if he aided that poor family he wouldn't feel so convicted.to loose someone at someone else doing, that's horrible.we've all done things "wrong" but it's how we deal with it, do we hide or show ourselves. |
|
+17
|
Posted by 4thelaw - 2/26/2013 8:11:56 AM
|
|
|
A 6-10 year sentence for his crimes is not unreasonable, however it is excessive when previous cases are considered.
Former officer Houpt killed two people while driving drunk, and received probation.
Malmkar should appeal his sentencing. |
|
-61
|
Posted by SRW - 2/26/2013 8:06:36 AM
|
|
|
"Good Kid", what a joke. He kills a man, flees, the scene, goes to Alcohol treatment, robs a restaurant, and smoke bung hole weed in jail and all this = good kid. Mr. Lindemeier, I know you are an attorney but come one, did you really expect anyone to buy that line of garbage? |
|
+46
|
Posted by PB - 2/26/2013 6:50:10 AM
|
|
|
6-10 sound fair considering he keeps re-offending. To set the record straight, he never violated parole because parole happens AFTER you are released from prison. He may have violated the terms of his bond. |
|
+9
|
Posted by tiger4 - 2/26/2013 6:30:28 AM
|
|
|
My thoughts and prayers for both sides in this situation. |
|
+25
|
Posted by NPNative - 2/25/2013 9:56:33 PM
|
|
|
A tragedy, hopefully a lasting lesson about living in the fast lane. Prayers to everyone involved. |
|
+18
|
Posted by original - 2/25/2013 9:20:40 PM
|
|
|
Our justice system is a complete joke. I loved the part where it said Rebecca Harling made no comment. This guy violates parole while he was in Lincoln, then gets caught with weed while in jail in North Platte and she has no comment. Why are we paying this lady? Maybe justice will come to him in Lincoln. |
|
+45
|
Posted by MichaelA - 2/25/2013 8:31:04 PM
|
|
|
Haunts him? Really? He had ,like the judge said, a chance to make changes ,but didn't care enough to.If he wanted to take responsibility for his actions , he should of stood and confessed and asked for the maximum sentence. |
|
+27
|
Posted by meangirl - 2/25/2013 6:45:22 PM
|
|