Log In | Register   
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

Mail: Good time to adopt a cat

Mail: Wanted, class of 1943 graduates

More opinion

Ag News

UNL Short course: Invasive plants

Unapproved genetically altered wheat shows up in Oregon

More Ag News


Email Article | Print Article
Opinion - Opinion
 
Johanns: Clearing the air at EPATell North Platte what you think
 
Photo by George Lauby
Sen. Mike Johanns

What do farmers and ranchers, builders and businesspeople have in common?

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

One thing I keep hearing from constituents in these respective industries is that an onslaught of rules and regulations from federal agencies has hampered their abilities to develop new innovations and create needed jobs.

Since President Obama took office, more than 308,000 pages of new rules have been added to the Federal Register. That’s enough paper to cover more than four and a half acres of farmland, and weighs more than three Ford F-150 pickups trucks.

The Environmental Protection Agency is one of the worst offenders, proposing roughly $172 billion in compliance costs for new regulations last year alone.

While it is important that we ensure our environment is adequately protected, the way EPA conducts business must change.

That’s why, last week, I introduced four bills to help clear the air with EPA’s operation.

Although the contents of EPAs regulations are often problematic, the agency’s regulatory processes are another great cause for concern. Instead of treating states as equals, for example, EPA has chosen to force states to adopt one-size-fits-all federal enforcement plans.

EPA has also circumvented Congress by making major policy changes through guidance documents, which are not subject to Congressional review the same way rules are -- a loophole that can be used to broaden the scope of existing law without following the standard rulemaking process.

In 2011, EPA issued a guidance document defining waters of the United States, which are subject to certain federal laws, substantially expanding those laws’ jurisdictions.

The legislation I introduced would address these issues and increase accountability at EPA.

One bill would provide Congress greater oversight by bringing EPA guidance documents under the scope of the Congressional Review Act.

A second piece of legislation would require EPA’s Inspector General to report to Congress twice a year on the agency’s progress in meeting regulatory reporting requirements in current law.

A third bill would reduce EPA’s budget by $20,000 every week until EPA meets its legal deadlines for regulatory agenda-setting.

And the final component would promote transparency and cooperation with state governments by requiring EPA to provide timely information and technical assistance to states working to comply with EPA mandates.

A federal agency with the reach and influence of the EPA must be transparent in its operations and cooperative with states, industries and businesses it effects. Unfortunately, EPA has been as transparent as the mud puddles it is trying to regulate.

EPA must change the way it does things. My legislation can help to restore critical public and congressional oversight.



Sen. Mike Johanns represents Nebraska in the U.S. Senate.


Like this story to send to your facebook

The North Platte Bulletin - Published 2/18/2013
Copyright © 2013 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
It is folly to allow a bureaucratic agency like the EPA to have a bunch of power. Power corrupts, that's why the Constitution requires decision makers to be elected and creates checks and balances. The EPA needs more oversight.
+11
Posted by original    - 2/19/2013 11:47:25 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Does it make sense to attempt to prevent the Keystone pipeline and completely ignore the thousands of miles of existing pipelines. How about the millions of gallons of hazardous chemicals stored at facilities throughout the state. There are millions of gallons of fuel in underground storage in every town in the state. What about the millions of gallons of hazardous chemicals sitting in the worlds largest railroad classification yard and the continuous transportation of the same over the rails that have a clear record of giving way and causing spills. Then there are countless trucks traveling highways everywhere posing the threat of leakage into waterways. Maybe the feedlots with 80,000 head concentrated in a small area could even potentially contaminate a water supply. Literally millions of pounds of chemicals are purposely sprayed directly on the ground throughout our crop growing regions. With all this the environmental wack jobs out there are holding the democrats back from passing legislation on a pipeline the even the nonpartisan Nebraska environmental quality studies showed as completely safe and extremely low risk has given a green light.
+17
Posted by sako    - 2/19/2013 8:52:29 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Lets Also remember....the Birth of the EPA...was a Richard Nixon signed Bill on Dec.2,1970 This Bill was born during the time of Unchecked Poluttion of our River,Lakes and Streams,not to mention fining Industries that continued to do so, as well as bring in our first Earth Day.It was the start o the End of the Raping of our Land.Superfunds to help clean up such devestation were also started.We started to learn and use the word Ecology.Now, we have 'Green'industries.The only peope than want Less Green,are those on the Right that complain about such Regulations. We can not go back in time....to the days before when we had people getting sick from their drinking water and of days when we were told NOT to play outside!! Do we want to return to those days....of having our kids get Cancers beyound belief from our water tables? To see our skies above Denver, or L.A.,or Omaha ? No way ! I applaud those in the White House today that look out for Our interests, and not those of Big Oil and Big Coal. Who has the interests of the people ,not just of Nebraska,but of the Nation and of the World. Either conservationist John Muir or Walt Whitman once said,and I paraphrase,' most people are one the Earth not In the Earth'.We only have one Planet,and we should do everything we can to keep it Clean.I hope to ewrite the W.H. and ask him to NOT support the Keystone pipeline. Think of it, an Oil Pipeline laying on top, of the largest Aquifer in North America?? No Way! And 'fracking' is the worst thing for our Water table and for our farms.Please look up what that Big Oil proceedure is and does to the land.The EPA is to protect us from Industry,and thats a good thing.
-38
Posted by AJSDAD    - 2/18/2013 5:54:13 PM
(1 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back

Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 

Copyright © 2003 - 2013 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 54.242.96.48
North Platte, Nebraska