Log In | Register   
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

North Korean threats cut close to home

Sexual dis-orientation and the Boy Scouts

More opinion

Ag News

Sustainable crop residues on cow/calf, yearling operations

Registrations due for tractor safety course

More Ag News


   
Email Article | Print Article
News - Local News
 
Shots heard 'round the world prompt anti-gun effortsTell North Platte what you think
 
Courtesy Photo­Image
Courtesy Photo­Image

Just 11 days before Christmas, a young man broke into an elementary school in Connecticut and fired the shots heard round the world.

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

He killed 26 people, most of them children.

The shots were said to have come from an AR-15 rifle.

Echoes of those gunshots continue to reverberate throughout the United States, as the nation tries to figure out how to keep such slaughters from happening again.

Not long after the shootings, President Barack Obama proposed his idea — a stiff set of new gun laws.

But gun owners were already protesting more restrictions. Among their powerful arguments, they note that the right to bear arms is guaranteed not to be infringed under the U.S. Constitution.

The debate intensifies.

As of Thursday, 90 sheriffs, many from rural counties, had pledged not to enforce laws they deem unconstitutional, according to the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, a Texas-based group that vows "to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama's unlawful gun control measures."

On Saturday, about 6,000 protestors marched near the White House, urging stricter gun laws. Many of the protestors were women -- mothers.

Responses from each coast of the U.S. are strikingly different. On Jan. 14, exactly one month after the Connecticut shootings, New York became the first state in the country to enact new restrictions.

Two days earlier in California, a mental health official told a crowd that spilled out of a town hall meeting that steps are being taken to find mentally ill young students, such as the shooters in Connecticut and at a movie theater in Aurora, Colo., and get them some help.

“In the last year and a half, we’ve been able to hospitalize about 10 young people, get them stabilized and they have been able to stay in school,” Sonoma County Mental Health Board Chair Mike Kennedy told the crowd.

Sonoma County is near San Francisco. Kennedy has a “crisis prevention assessment team” that works in a community college as well as nine high schools. The team is comprised of teachers, administrators and increasing numbers of students.

“We provide what we call Question-Persuade-Refer training,” Kennedy said. "It’s an evidence-based model that teaches individuals the signs of mental illness, depression and suicide, and teaches them what questions to ask, and how to persuade somebody to get help, and how to access help.”

The program is so successful that other schools are training entire incoming freshmen classes in QPR, as well as teachers, Kennedy said.

The town hall forum where Kennedy spoke lasted more than two hours. Members of the public received two minutes to make statements. The majority opposed more gun restrictions.

The forum was broadcast nationally on C-SPAN.

Kennedy said the crisis prevention team “gives us the ability to do aggressive outreach and target young people between the ages of 16 and their mid-20s that are having either first psychotic breaks or serious mental illness.”

“It’s one of the programs that could be extremely helpful and prevent some of these tragedies,” he said.

Meanwhile, new gun restrictions were quickly proceeding through the New York state legislature, passing by wide margins.


New law in New York

The New York laws ban semi-automatic pistols, rifles with detachable magazines and one military-style feature, as well as semiautomatic shotguns with one military-style feature.

New York state will require background checks of ammunition buyers. Law enforcement will be automatically notified of high-volume purchases of ammo, under the new law.

Gun owners will be required to register on a statewide database.

And, mental health professionals will be required to tell local mental health officials when they believe patients are likely to harm themselves or others, the New York Times reported.

Critics of the mental-health-reporting provision said it breaks the privacy of counselor-patient conversations, so patients will be less likely to speak freely with counselors, and counselors will be less able to help.


AR-15

The facts of the Connecticut shooting are still disputed, including the exact guns that were used. Early reports said the shooter left an AR-15 in the car and used handguns, but police said two days later that he definitely used the AR-15, firing rounds from magazines that each contained 30 shots, then shot himself with a handgun.

National Rifle Association President David Keene, and others, say the AR-15 is not an assault weapon designed to wreak havoc in battle, but just a semi-automatic commercial rifle that fires only when the trigger is pulled.

The gun is hugely popular, owned by millions of people across the United States, commonly used on firing ranges and kept in case it is ever needed to defend oneself, one’s family or property.

The AR-15 was designed for the military and was re-branded the M16 during the Vietnam War years, according to Talking Points Memo, a digital political news organization that issued a report on the gun a week after the Connecticut school shooting.

The gun is lightweight, air-cooled, gas-operated and magazine-fed. Its .223 caliber bullet was developed at the request of the military, capable of striking and penetrating a steel helmet at 500 yards.

AR-15s are used, according to the Talking Points Memo report, by “hundreds of police departments and law enforcement organizations nationwide, (and) by the military of more than 50 countries worldwide.”

The AR-15 is in higher demand than ever now, as consumers fear the gun will be outlawed and they will be unable to buy it. The gun cost about $400 a year ago. Prices have tripled since then.


NRA: Focus on mental illness

NRA President Keene voices powerful pro-gun arguments, especially that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.

He notes that automatic weapons are already banned and background checks are conducted before licensed dealers sell guns. He said that it’s a crime to illegally try to buy a gun, but people who do are hardly ever prosecuted – about 47 out of 77,000 last year.

If existing laws are not enforced, more won’t help, Keene said.

Keene and other gun proponents also note that the government could go bad in the United States. He said founding father Thomas Jefferson said individuals owning guns is a requirement in a free nation.

Jefferson once said, “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

Keene wants more focus on mental illness.

“We have proposed over time that those who’ve been adjudicated to be potentially violently mentally ill should be included on the list that is checked when someone tries to buy a gun,” Keene said in an interview with Newsmax.

That's what we need to fix, he said.

“Almost every one of these mass shootings have involved not a criminal, but somebody who’s literally crazy, somebody who’s a violent schizophrenic,” he said.

Keene said in one of the most famous early mass shootings, the fellow who climbed onto the clock tower at the University of Texas (in 1966) told his psychiatrist what he was going to do: climb up onto the clock tower and shoot students.

Meanwhile, when it comes to more gun control, emails are circulating on both sides of the issue -- with pointed, pithy messages.

“Saw a really good movie last night where only the police and the military had guns,” one of them says. “It was called Schindler’s List (about the killing of millions of people by the Nazis who had guns.)”

Keene said our national priorities are wrong.

“(After the Connecticut shooting) the question they asked was not how do we protect our kids, (or) what do we do to prevent or minimize the chances of this happening again,” Keene said. “The question they asked was what can we do about guns.”



This report was first published in the Jan. 16 print edition of the North Platte Bulletin, your non-corporate newspaper.


Like this story to send to your facebook

The North Platte Bulletin - Published 1/26/2013
Copyright © 2013 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
I also wonder what anti gun people think about a Mini 14, its semi automatic but is a traditional rifle stock instead of a more modern stock with a pistol grip.
0
Posted by Mike    - 1/31/2013 8:38:47 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

You want to know one thing that is interesting? With the AR platform of rifles, you can actually get a bolt action for them. I wonder want anti gun people would say about that? Its still got a pistol grip and still looks like an assault rifle, but is not semi automatic.
0
Posted by Mike    - 1/30/2013 3:07:32 PM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

Ok, but still, the AR15 and the M16 are basically siblings, and the AR10 would be a cousin or a half sibling or something.
0
Posted by Mike    - 1/30/2013 3:05:49 PM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

More education: The AR-15 is a semi-automatic, NOT an automatic rifle. The AR does NOT stand for "automatic rifle", it stands for Armalite Rifle, which is the company that developed it. Also, it is NOT a decendant of the M-16, it was developed before the M-16 to be used by pilots who were shot down, to protect themselves.
+1
Posted by rockyb    - 1/30/2013 2:19:13 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Some animals are created more equal than others. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1EObqM9Z0s
+4
Posted by Diogenes    - 1/28/2013 5:51:17 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

And yet another study that proves that gun control does not reduce crime. http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/local/central-virginia/gun-related-homicides-and-injuries-down-as-firearm-sales-soar/article_f573c648-2e22-5534-a2a8-56fa0fef0fdb.html
+4
Posted by stangman    - 1/28/2013 4:41:45 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Taking my guns away is not my current concern. Taking away my right to purchase the firearm of my choosing or an additional magazine for my HK P220 is very much a concern. I have spent numerous hours in safety training and many more on my shooting range without incident, never a legal problem and never a mental problem, never taken a psychotropic drug or anything else that infringes on someone elses rights. Why do the ignorant politicians get to decide how "common sense" regulations are defined when they cannot even define what an assault weapon is or know the difference between a clip and a magazine?
+8
Posted by sako    - 1/28/2013 3:31:20 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I never said anyone would have to give anything up, I have even gone as far as saying that an assault weapons ban won't do much good. Nobody is going to take your guns away unless you commit a crime with them and since you obey the laws you're good to go.
-9
Posted by Mike    - 1/28/2013 1:33:53 PM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

A semi-automatic rifle, NOT an AR-15 (which stands for Automatic Rifle not semi-automatic rifle) was used at Sandy Hook. And Mike, using your logic, I, a law abiding citizen, must give up my right to defend myself with anything but a bolt action rifle against the nuts and criminals that possess these semi-automatic rifles?
+7
Posted by Onlooker    - 1/28/2013 1:07:05 PM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

And the other thing, Steve, is yes, you can fire rounds very fast from other non-semi automatic weapons. Buuuuut I'd like to see you fire 30 rounds in a matter of seconds from a Winchester Model 70. They only hold 3-5 bullets instead of 30 bullets like most AR15 magazines, or even 100 like some of the big drum magazines.

The guy may or may not have used an AR15 rifle in Connecticut, the details are fuzzy. But the guy that shot up the movie theater in Colorado used an AR15 (a jam in his 100 round magazine prevented him from killing any more people), there was a kid that killed his whole family with an AR15 (yeah, he could have potentially used any gun, but thats beside the point), and the guy that shot up the mall in Omaha several years ago used an AK47, in Washington DC several years ago there was the guy sniping people from the trunk of a car with an AR15. You just don't see mass murders being committed with bolt action hunting rifles.
-9
Posted by Mike    - 1/28/2013 12:29:16 PM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

Another example of not understanding the issue. The 5.56 round is nothing more than a .223 round. A .223 round is available in a number of different configurations publically, including semi-auto, bolt, pump and single shot. The ability of the round to shoot through a helmey at 500 yards has nothing to do with the platform it is fired from, and everything to do with the projectile it launches. Some of the actual bullets launched from the weapon have next to no chance of piercing a helmet because of how they were designed, and what they are intended to do. Others can. What remains the same, is that these projectiles are available to everyone regardless of the configuration of the weapon that will be firing them. Funny thing is...there's a whole lot of other weapons available that will shoot through a helmet at 500 yards a lot easier than a 5.56/.223 round...so this whole tangent of why the 5.56 M-16 was produced for the military has little to do with the current debate, other than to inflame the senses of those who don't understand the issues, and who fail to take the time to educate themselves of the reality...
+11
Posted by Yoda    - 1/28/2013 12:07:06 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

What civilian needs to shoot a hole through a helmet at 500 yards? Thats not a very good thing to say when you are trying to protect your own gun rights. If you're worried about whether or not you can shoot through a helmet at a certain distance you are implying that you are going to use that gun to kill a person wearing a helmet.
-19
Posted by Mike    - 1/28/2013 11:38:48 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

First of all....A AR-15 was not used at sandy hook elementary....That is a lie that continues to be spread by the main stream media. Second....The M-16 is actually one of the weakest weapons the military has ever had....The 5.56 round will not penetrate a helmet at 500 yards(I have tried it, It has a hard time doing that at 100 yards) and the weapon was actually adopted by the military with the intent of being LESS dangerous of a round compared to previous weapons. Almost all of your common hunting rifles carry more power than the 5.56/223 round and most can be shot just as fast as the ar-15 when in the hands of a experienced shooter.
+11
Posted by Steve    - 1/28/2013 11:29:34 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

"After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military." William S. Burroughs
+15
Posted by Diogenes    - 1/28/2013 10:43:23 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I'm sorry Mr NRA President, but the AR15 is as direct of a descendent of a military weapon (the M16) as you can get. And the M16 was meant to wreak havoc in battle.

That said, I don't really think an assault weapons ban is going to work. Since 2004 there have been millions of AR15a and AK47s put out into circulation, and contrary to popular belief nobody is going to kick in your door to take your guns. The Turner Diaries is just pretend. Like they always say, guns don't kill people-people kill people. Pencils don't misspell words, people misspell words. This is a scenario where the new Healthcare Law could really shine by providing better mental health care to the people who commit these crimes.
-4
Posted by Mike    - 1/28/2013 8:51:44 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

This is the first part of the Nebraska State Constituion...The Statement of Rights..."All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights; among these are life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the right to keep and bear arms for security or defense of self, family, home, and others, and for lawful common defense, hunting, recreational use, and all other lawful purposes, and such rights shall not be denied or infringed by the state or any subdivision thereof. To secure these rights, and the protection of property, governments are instituted among people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." I thought that was interesting.
+16
Posted by Onlooker    - 1/27/2013 3:09:46 PM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

My big problem is why the media will not report that gun control has no impact on crime and may in fact make it worse. I realize that many other countries have a lower murder rate but their violent crime rates are several times the US. Plus no one wants to talk about the fact that over 50% of shooters have a felony arrest. Also, most homicides are in urban areas, I mean Chicago acounts for more than 5% of the US homicides (a gun control mecca). Now I will agree there are likely a few items that are actually gun related that might have a positive outcome (allowing anyone access to the background check system) but they are few and far between.
+13
Posted by stangman    - 1/27/2013 2:47:08 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

This reminds me of the movie "Wag the Dog" with Dustin Hoffman. A "Creation of the Crazies" has just been done on gun control.
-7
Posted by Online    - 1/27/2013 11:53:53 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Why doesn't the Gun Control Lobby ever mention, what has always happened to countries that have hed guns confiscated
+19
Posted by tess tickle    - 1/27/2013 7:51:28 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

It is not about gun control it is people control. There is not a single suggestion coming out of Washington DC that would have prevented the tragedy committed by a disturbed individual.
+34
Posted by sako    - 1/26/2013 9:30:23 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back

Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 


Copyright © 2003 - 2013 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 54.235.20.17
North Platte, Nebraska