Log In | Register   
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

Mail: Good time to adopt a cat

Mail: Wanted, class of 1943 graduates

More opinion

Ag News

UNL Short course: Invasive plants

Unapproved genetically altered wheat shows up in Oregon

More Ag News


   
Email Article | Print Article
News - Local News
 
School administrator placed on leaveTell North Platte what you think
 

Principal Shane Alexander was placed on paid administrative leave at the end of the school day Monday at Washington Elementary School in North Platte, pending an investigation.

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

Superintendent Marty Bassett said only that it is a personnel matter and no assumptions are to be made.

Central office administrators Tami Eshleman and Bassett have stepped in for Alexander at Washington until the investigation is complete.

A North Platte Police spokesman said there is no criminal investigation.

Alexander has been the principal at Washington since fall 2011. Before then, he was the principal at Eisenhower Elementary for three years.


Like this story to send to your facebook

The North Platte Bulletin - Published 1/18/2013
Copyright © 2013 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
I am glad people are so full of information and know when to state people are wrong or right. As previously stated...Its more of a conflict of interest between said super boss and principal. Wait and see...new superintendent new rules it isn't like it use to be..now Shane Alexander is forced to resign.
-2
Posted by gabby1    - 1/30/2013 9:25:39 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

Yes he resigned...he is forced to do so or be fired. Now he can slime his way into another position by cushioning his resignation excuse on his resume. There's not enough background checking when choosing someone who is supposed to set examples for our children.
+3
Posted by Opinionated    - 1/30/2013 2:55:48 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I heard he resigned today ???
0
Posted by waitnsee    - 1/29/2013 11:31:25 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Tiger4 - That is not what 'personnel' means.

Witness- That's exactly what I'm talking about. Passing these tests are now the ONLY goal of school 'personnel'. It's how they are scrambling for job security. If I got and take the practive driving test on the dmv website over and over, I'm going to know the answers to all the questions when I go take my test. I'm not going to necessarily be a great driver or utilize the answers. I just have them memorized.
0
Posted by parapraxis    - 1/23/2013 2:04:25 PM
(0 current warnings - 4 warnings total)

He did not instruct anyone to give students answers! He wanted to copy questions to form a more extensive curriculem to advance the students in problem areas!
0
Posted by witness    - 1/22/2013 7:38:16 PM
(0 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

morgan . yes you can go sit in on class as a parent !!!!! any one who tell you different has lied to you !if your child in in that class in is our right to and most teachers incourage it! i had to last year every day on my lunch hour for probly 2 months!
-1
Posted by crazyhonisty    - 1/22/2013 4:48:15 PM
(0 current warnings - 4 warnings total)

I wish parents, and other interested adults, could freely, with permission, quietly and politely sit in on classes. Public web cams??? It would be nice to see what actually is taught, and how. But teachers' unions would never allow that, I bet.
+3
Posted by Morgan Greenwood    - 1/22/2013 12:54:53 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

"Personnel" means it has to do with the job and it's none of your business. If my family member was suspected of not doing their job right, they would be on leave until their boss decided one way or the other. And it wouldn't be your business either. People have the right to privacy when under suspicion of not performing their duties. There is nothing being "hidden" from the public at this time. Let the system work.
+2
Posted by tiger4    - 1/22/2013 9:36:24 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Oh ok, so he asked you directly to do that? Glad we cleared that up... But isn't it supposed to be confidential until investigation is over?
+2
Posted by Truthhurts    - 1/21/2013 9:09:29 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

O.K. Haters, he instructed teachers to copy test questions! He is the person they speak of when they say "personnel"!
-4
Posted by witness    - 1/21/2013 6:28:42 PM
(0 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

npborngirl opens another facet of conversation. If he was telling the teachers to give answers to standardized testing, that's absolutely wrong. However, is standardized testing really that helpful to our students and teachers?

School employee's jobs are secure only based on these test scores. Teacher's now spend the entire year hammering in the information from the tests instead of teaching on a class by class basis, taking away all that would make them unique. These tests really hurt the education system as a whole I think, and I would bet anything that this "just give them the answers" mentality happens all over the country. The "no child left behind" probably had good intentions behind it, but it's just not working out. Kind of like communism. :)
+7
Posted by parapraxis    - 1/21/2013 2:55:29 PM
(0 current warnings - 4 warnings total)

You guys are making this into more than it probably is by interchanging the word "personal" with "personnel". The story clearly says "personnel", as in another employee of the school. Probably what happened was someone filed an anonymous complaint (which is why there is only one person on paid leave) and they have to follow through on it with an investigation. If they didn't you'd be crying foul.
+4
Posted by Mike    - 1/21/2013 8:47:12 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

i think its about "teaching to the tests" & instructing his teachers to give students answeres to standardised tests. Not as fun as booze for YOU ALL, but way more destructive to the education of our young
-10
Posted by npborngirl    - 1/21/2013 8:19:02 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

TRUTHHURTS, its been made official to those pertinant to the story! Sorry, you don't happen to be one!
-12
Posted by witness    - 1/20/2013 7:23:50 PM
(0 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

Psst, psst, I heard he ridiculed too many silly comments on Talkback and some of you complained. What power all of you have.
+12
Posted by are you kidding?    - 1/20/2013 6:22:02 PM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

I hope if I ever have to go to court I dont have any of you on my jury you all have your mines mayed up no idea for sure the real deal
+8
Posted by dreamer    - 1/20/2013 12:02:42 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

They better look into more admin. if personal issues are reflecting jobs. Opinionated, it sounds like you have a personal opinion about Mr. Alexander. My guess is relation or friend of ex wife... Personal problems should not reflect his job and anyone who goes after someones job for those reasons needs to rethink the situation as though it isn't. Nobody likes everyone they come across but it doesnt mean we ruin their lives with slander and lies.
+12
Posted by Truthhurts    - 1/20/2013 11:37:34 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

KARMA...he has no morals and shouldn't be in the school system! A principal that was married and dating a students mother at the same time! Asked to resign from another school for inappropriate touching of students...how he got this position in the first place is amazing! No pay and no job...KARMA
-6
Posted by Opinionated    - 1/20/2013 5:05:16 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Witness, you seem to know quite a bit about the accusations being made about Mr. Alexander, why is that? And until its official about what happened I think everyone needs to stop the rumor mill that could cost his reputation.
+22
Posted by Truthhurts    - 1/19/2013 9:25:18 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

It is exhausting and confusing that the superintendant want to hide this, but there is no reason to expect anything different with the past experience with our local city, county offices.
-22
Posted by witness    - 1/19/2013 10:40:25 AM
(0 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

daddy, its not a personnel matter either,That would implicate other staff is involved, so there is no more accusations and rumors, he gave misdirections on a state test administered to the students. Whether he knew he was doing wrong or not, that is for the school admin to decide! Mr. Alexander has had controversy surrounding his past positions, so let's hope the board decides to let him go!
-23
Posted by witness    - 1/19/2013 10:38:09 AM
(0 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

gabby, wrong also!
-7
Posted by witness    - 1/19/2013 10:31:39 AM
(0 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

youwish, it has nothing to do with alcohol so don't start rumors!
+2
Posted by witness    - 1/19/2013 10:29:20 AM
(0 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

thetruth, its paid administrative leave not personal!
-1
Posted by witness    - 1/19/2013 10:28:37 AM
(0 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

Sensible, it's not a personal matter, it's a personnel matter. There is a big difference. And just because you pay taxes does NOT give you the right to know why a school administrator, teacher or any staff is being investigated. Does it give you the right to see a teacher's performance evaluation? I think not. The truth... You can't just not pay someone because there is something that needs investigating. I agree, if guilty, no pay, but give due process a chance.
+12
Posted by whozurdaddy    - 1/19/2013 9:12:13 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

this has go to stop. even though he is innocent until proven guilty, he should not get preferential treatment that the people paying his wage would not receive. If he is guilty of whatever, then no pay and reprimand/terminate his employment. If he is innocent, then reinstate him in his position. However, if he is not performing his dailey duties, NO PAY/NO BENEFITS.
+1
Posted by thetruth    - 1/19/2013 9:00:55 AM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

What "personal" matter would require a leave (with pay) pending further investigation? If it was just personal the school wouldn't be involved. It must have something to do with his job performance. Of course, unless he is terminated we will never know the truth. And that sucks. IF a school official is being investigated we as parents and tax payers have a right to know why.
+1
Posted by sensible    - 1/19/2013 8:33:47 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Its more of a conflict of interest between said super boss and principal. Wait and see
-22
Posted by gabby1    - 1/19/2013 3:35:22 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

dont we all deserve paid leave???
-8
Posted by Flat Rock franny    - 1/18/2013 10:04:51 PM
(0 current warnings - 7 warnings total)

I find it hard to believe that he was coming to work drinking although I heard the same rumor But that what it is a Rumor! Im sure the truth will come out hope for his sake its not true!
0
Posted by waitnsee    - 1/18/2013 8:00:47 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

thetruth . . . think "innocent until proven guilty".
+3
Posted by capnamerca    - 1/18/2013 7:13:43 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

boozy boozy drinky drinky. not supposed to come to work after cocktails, right?
-28
Posted by youwish    - 1/18/2013 5:43:03 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

why is it that pretty much everytime a person is "put on paid personal leave pending an investigation" they are public employees? Dont see that happening in the private workforce.
+1
Posted by thetruth    - 1/18/2013 4:57:50 PM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

I was going to make assumptions, but since Bassett said not to...I guess I won't.
0
Posted by parapraxis    - 1/18/2013 4:14:05 PM
(0 current warnings - 4 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back

Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 


Copyright © 2003 - 2013 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 50.16.108.167
North Platte, Nebraska