Log In | Register   
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

Legislature: Retirement plan needs revisions

Why I ride a motorcycle

More opinion

Ag News

Johanns opposes Farm Bill as 'costly, gimmick-laden'

Livestock judging clinic set

More Ag News


   
Email Article | Print Article
News - Local News
 
First Lady says ‘Let’s move,’ schools say ‘already are’Tell North Platte what you think
 
Courtesy Photo­Image
Courtesy Photo­Image

First Lady Michelle Obama worries about overweight kids, but parents and school teachers worry that students are not getting enough to eat.

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

After the first two weeks of the 2012 school year, students and teachers have had a chance to experience the First Lady’s revised lunch program for themselves.

Obama, concerned by the increase in obesity and childhood diabetes in public schools, has strengthened the requirements of fruits and vegetables at lunch.


“It’s tough to get used to. Lots of schools around the country were giving away seconds and over-portioning, but the state said ‘no, you can’t do that.’” -- Larry Young, in charge of meals at North Platte Public Schools.


Obama’s “Let’s Move” campaign aims to reduce fats, sodium, consumption of unneeded calories, to foster healthy and nutritious eating habits in children.

The Child Nutrition Act dates back to the 1960s to the Lyndon Johnson administration, and Congress regularly reauthorizes and sometimes modifies the act, with help from the Department of Agriculture in consultation with the Institute of Medicine.

But local officials in Arnold and Stapleton say obesity is not as big of a concern in their schools compared to metropolitan areas, because rural students tend to be much more active.

“These laws don’t always fit our rural areas,” Arnold Principal Dawn Lewis said. “Our children are active from elementary through high school. Most of the elementary students participate in Pee Wee or junior high volleyball or football and some go to gymnastics or dance. High school students who lift weights arrive at 6 a.m. and are here until after practice at 6 p.m.”

Officials in Hershey and North Platte say the lunch requirements haven’t really changed, but the paperwork has increased. They say the “Let’s Move” lunch program requires extra expenses. Cooks spend hours filling out mandatory paper work. And, public workers have been hired to review and approve the meals.


Stapleton: too light

Stapleton School Secretary Chris Harvey said that 90 percent of the children in the school participate in some form of physical activity after school. She estimates the percentage of overweight children in their school at about 3 percent. She estimates the severely underweight children at 4 percent. Harvey said all of the underweight children are on free and reduced meals and would not be able to afford the extra protein.

Stapleton school nurse Jennifer Johnston said that “Physically active children need more nutrition to learn and to grow.”


Hershey adjusts

But Hershey Elementary Principal Jason Callahan said the staff was concerned about the federal requirements when they first heard about them, but the kitchen staff has done a good job of adjusting and he has not had any complaints.


North Platte: Same requirements

North Platte officials say the requirements haven’t changed, just shifted in emphasis.

“The protein requirement hasn’t changed; the breads and grains haven’t changed, the milk requirements haven’t changed; they are just enforcing it more,” said Larry Young, the director of Sodexho, a company that handles North Platte’s public school meals.

Nor have portion sizes changed, Young said. But this year, students are required to eat a half cup of fruit or vegetables every day.

“They are emphasizing fruits and vegetables and holding to (long-standing) limits on breads and proteins,” Young said. “It’s tough to get used to. Lots of schools around the country were giving away seconds and over-portioning, but the state said ‘no, you can’t do that.’”

If students want extra helpings, they have to buy them.

And unlike the cost of the main meal, second helpings are not subsidized for low-income families by the federal government, so costs could keep some students from eating as much as they need.

Hershey tries to compensate by offering an unlimited salad bar to every student and keeping costs low for extra helpings – 50 cents an entrée, Callahan said.

Sodexho charges students $1.75-$2 for a (three entrée) second meal instead of selling just 1-2 extra entrées, but students can share, Young said.

Young said record keeping is quite a challenge, even for students, who make their choices as they go through the line. They must pick three of five entrees on the menu. They can skip meat if they choose, but they must have their milk, fruit or vegetables. Meat and bread are optional.

“They could have peaches, green beans and milk for lunch, for instance,” Young said.

“I can see how the changes are a problem for smaller districts,” North Platte School Board President Jim Paloucek said. “We are fortunate to be a larger district and contract with Sodexho. A lot of schools don’t have that luxury."

Paloucek agreed that the requirements are strict. The federal government won’t subsidize free and reduced-price lunches at all if a school doesn’t comply with the new standards.

Arnold School Secretary Penny Allen said federal programs such as Title 1, IDEA (special education) and school lunch subsidies are all interconnected and refusing to comply would cost Arnold approximately $50,000 per year, a pricey proposition.

Sen. Mike Johanns has forwarded some of the concerns from Arnold and Stapleton to the USDA in Washington.


This report was first published in the Sept. 5 print edition of the North Platte Bulletin.


Like this story to send to your facebook

The North Platte Bulletin - Published 9/21/2012
Copyright © 2012 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
I have an idea! Let's make schools for profit! Then they can compete by dropping the kids who need the most help so they can boost their numbers and make more money. It's worked so well with healthcare, I'm not sure why we aren't emulating this already? Oh wait. we are.
0
Posted by outsider    - 9/25/2012 10:45:58 AM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

Good comments So what does everyone think has to happen in order to get the government out of our school systems? Because that's how this all came about.
0
Posted by Morgan Greenwood    - 9/25/2012 12:29:18 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I think children in elementary should be given more time to eat! I have a friend whose child gets recess first and then they go in to eat lunch and they only get 20 minutes to eat! This isn't enough time!!! The staff gets more time than this to eat!
0
Posted by tax5555    - 9/24/2012 11:26:11 AM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

Country...you hit the nail on the head. And all that premade processed 'crap' is not cheaper. Good ol' home cooking taste better, is healthier and cost less, but no it is not quick and easy! When I went to school (now I am dating myself) we had one lunch choice, cooked at our school daily. If we didn't want the hot lunch we could have the brown bag lunch. It was a choice of a PB&J or cheese sandwich, a piece of fruit (usually an apple) a cookie (usually oatmeal raisen)and some carrot or celery sticks. All Lunches came with white whole milk and you could could get a scoop of ice cream (choc. or van.) for a dime. Lets get back to basics. Cook a good meal offer a cold lunch alternative and get rid of the 15+ minute lunch order fiasco every morning.
0
Posted by sensible    - 9/24/2012 9:11:56 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Having subbed in every elementary and middle school in NP I have seen a great diversity in 'feeding children'. In schools with a low ratio of students on the free lunch program many more bring their lunch than buy it. Some even bring a sack lunch and buy the school lunch. Some schools do provide a mid morning or mid afternoon snack, depending upon lunch time, but only in kindergarten. In schools with a high concentration of free lunch students, there is also a higher rate of behavior problems. These are the kids that may not be getting what they need at home (not just nutrition wise)and need a good breakfast and lunch at school. This means they need meals that are healthy, nutritious and sustaining. High protein and complexe carbs aren't found in canned string beans and canned peaches. Soy Burgers and fake chicken nuggets don't cut it either. I am all for watching out for empty calories, animal fats, triglicerides(sp), salt and processed sugars however, kids need to eat to keep going. The free lunch program was put into practice because hungry kids do not preform well...so now we give them free food while leaving them hungry in an hour. When I sub I bring crackers, animal crackers, granola bars, cheese sticks or something so when I have 'hungry kids' they can have a snack. I might tie it into an activity or something or just have a snack time. However, I don't have to do it every day unlike a teacher who would have to. Lets feed these kids so teachers don't have to and so they can make it through the day. For what they are charging these kids should get alot more then they are getting.
0
Posted by sensible    - 9/24/2012 9:00:27 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

My kids are starving right after school, i feed them breakfast and they tell me, that the lunch they get isnt filling them up. I understand its not a buffet and some kids probably cant eat the whole tray. I can not afford to send a home lunch but i do provide granola bars to snack in between till they get home. I wish that they can provide more portions and more varity.
0
Posted by love/hate    - 9/24/2012 7:57:36 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

The problem is that they are still feeding them processed crap. If it comes from a box or a can, it isnt real food anymore.
0
Posted by Country    - 9/24/2012 7:39:41 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Quit giving out an over abundance of FOOD STAMPS. Seriously go to the store during food stamp week and see what their carts are line with. Junk food.
0
Posted by honeygrams    - 9/24/2012 6:55:20 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

thetruth, that's what "fairness" is all about.
0
Posted by Diogenes    - 9/23/2012 10:29:12 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

You can lead a child to fruits and veges, but you can't make them eat them! I see everyday at the schools I sub at, they make the kids take the fruits and veges, never mind the child doesn't want them, won't eat them and they go in the trash. True! What is wrong with this picture? And, in response to "thetruth", sad isn't it? You as a parent pay the taxes for the children of illegal and immigrants children to eat school lunches free, and then have to pay again for your children to eat at all. When are the people of the US going to stand up and say "I'm mad as hell and I'm going to do something about it"?
0
Posted by fox    - 9/23/2012 8:01:20 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

When I reviewed the school lunch information packet prior to school starting this fall, I noticed a line that made me sick. It stated, "if you are a migrant worker or and illegal alien...you qualify for FREE school lunch's for your children...". After I wrote my check for $2500.00 for my children to eat school lunch's for the school year I thought what am I working so hard for to give my family a better life. I guess you can be illegal, get welfare, free housing, free medical, free education, and now a free lunch. Makes one think where our country has gone wrong.
0
Posted by thetruth    - 9/23/2012 6:24:12 AM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

not being critical here but for some kids this is there main meal of the day, i wish they would think more about what the kids like to eat and making it healthier for them, i see a lot of parents buying granola bars and things for after school sports,
0
Posted by Flat Rock franny    - 9/22/2012 9:14:49 PM
(0 current warnings - 7 warnings total)

Without the "socialists" a lot of kids wouldn't get any food at school. Can you guys ever stay on topic?
0
Posted by parapraxis    - 9/22/2012 1:49:12 PM
(0 current warnings - 4 warnings total)

Somebody call a wambulance. The socialists are taking over.
0
Posted by outsider    - 9/22/2012 1:44:46 PM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

I am all for kids eating healthier food, however, I think it needs to be more individualized. I have heard from several schools that the kids out for sports are hungry by the time practice starts. They are tiring too easy at practice because they are hungry. So why not allow the athletes to have more food?
0
Posted by notinnp    - 9/22/2012 10:11:48 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Right on trouble. Read my earlier post. Everyone needs to look it up. Don't listen to the propaganda, do the research.
0
Posted by tess tickle    - 9/22/2012 9:07:12 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

If only people would educate themselves on what is really going on with our foods they would realize that it's not just fast food, "junk food" and inactive people who have a weight problem. Look at athletes or people who do work out and eat how they have been told to. Start doing your own research on GMO's, Wheat and how it effects weight and glycemic load. Look at pictures from people in the 50 and 60's. Obesity was unheard of and not very many people were even overweight. Look at when they began making processed foods, using high frutose corn sugar, think about our food pyamid what is it they say we need alot of wheat and grains. Now there are some Dr.'s who are discovering when wheat and gluten is removed from the diet people are taking off weight without even trying to. Some people with diebetes are able to stop taking insulin and their blood sugars even out. If you think the FDA is looking out for you then your wrong, their in it for money period!! Some Dr.'s won't tell you because when your not sick they don't get money from you same with the pharmacy's your not worth anything to them healthy. Before you critize someone get your facts. Look ino things and I'll tell you now if they support it they are most likely getting a big fat check to do so.
0
Posted by trouble6583    - 9/22/2012 7:33:59 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

i dont have little kids any more but i hear from parents that are now packing there kids lunches that the kids are starved when they get home, even daycare food is effected,i have been on both sides of the fence i was a lunch lady and i know most of those kids who show up for breakfast and eat lunch are probibly getting there main meals at school, its been a few yrs and as the economy fails im sure there are more and more kids dependent on those meals,so what are the kids eatting that don't get lunch at school??? lunchables those arent healthy either the lunch program wasnt perfect but least kids were fed,all i can say is there leaving kids behind who depend on those meals,
0
Posted by Flat Rock franny    - 9/22/2012 7:27:22 AM
(0 current warnings - 7 warnings total)

My kids go to school early three days a week for band, and stay over four days a week for volleyball practice. They are STARVED when they come home, so we have been packing extra food and snacks for them at lunch and after school. What about families that don't have the resources to provide these extra snacks? Packing a lunch is a great idea for those who have a full pantry and fridge....but what about those children whose main food intake happens during school hours? Those are the kids who can't get the extra portions because they don't have the 50 cents it costs. I believe we can make lunches nutritious AND filling, and also allow for people of limited income to have access to seconds, if needed. Some familes rely on the school breakfast and lunch program as a main source of food for their kids. They simply don't have the money to be making up the difference between what a school can now serve and what a kid may need to stay full and attentive in school.
0
Posted by NPgrad89    - 9/22/2012 7:03:58 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

It is clear what Ms. Obama is up to. Her plan is to lighten up the young generation, make them weak from hunger. That way the kids will roll over and follow when the socialists take over. Their weapons will be milk shakes and french fries. What kid wouldn't follow after that? The proof is in the pudding...um, steamed broccoli. Fox News is all over this, open your eyes America!
0
Posted by Goat Boy    - 9/22/2012 7:00:48 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Marine Mom . . . the cure is simple. Pack your kids a good nutritious lunch. Fromm your comment, it's clear you aren't so well educated on nutrition as you think. Fruit and veggies vs bread and meat isn't as simple as carbs vs proteins.
0
Posted by capnamerca    - 9/22/2012 6:45:08 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

If our government really cared about the school lunch program, they would stop force feeding Geneticly Modified food, MSG, Aspartan and Pink Slime hamburger to all of us. All of which cause and contribute to childhood obesity and a host of other long term problems, including autism, many forms of cancer and behavioral problems, to name a few. Don't believe it? Look up, Jeffery Smith/GMO (google it), I dare everyone on here to.
0
Posted by tess tickle    - 9/22/2012 5:34:14 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

I think the Obama's are trying to kill the school lunch program, like they are trying to kill America. Fat kids start at home and not at school. It's because they have parents who do not fix supper anymore, they eat at the local sub sandwich joint or other fast food places. They do not turn off the tv, and make kids go outside and play or ride their bikes. Lifestyle changes at home would help. And how many kids like green beans unless they're camoflaged in mushroom soup casserole anyway?! They need more protein to sustain them through the day. And carbs won't do this and neither will fruit. You can't concentrate on school subjects if your stomach is hungry. It's just another way for more government control.
0
Posted by Marine Mom    - 9/21/2012 10:58:21 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back

Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 


Copyright © 2003 - 2013 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 54.234.42.16
North Platte, Nebraska