Log In | Register   
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

Legislature: Retirement plan needs revisions

Why I ride a motorcycle

More opinion

Ag News

Johanns opposes Farm Bill as 'costly, gimmick-laden'

Livestock judging clinic set

More Ag News


   
Email Article | Print Article
News - Local News
 
Maxwell school board takes no action against administrators Tell North Platte what you think
 

The Maxwell board of education spent more than two hours behind closed doors Monday and decided not to take action against three administrators who were recently cited for failure to report child abuse.

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

The citations stem from three wrestlers who allegedly sexually abused another wrestler at a 2011 camp, and another incident among wrestlers on a team bus in the spring of 2012.

The surprising citations sparked speculation about the extent of alleged abuse.

The board went into closed session shortly after the regular meeting began at 7 p.m. to talk about the charges and listen to concerned parents. At least two parents went behind the doors to talk personally with the board.

The school’s attorney Tim Thompson arrived and was admitted to the session. So was board member Doug Whisenhunt, who arrived late. No administrators were in the closed session.

When the board returned to open session about 9:15 p.m., board president Casey Meyer said no action would be taken regarding administrative personnel, and he did not elaborate.

Shane Montgomery, the chairman of the village board, asked why nothing was being done, to which Meyer said again that no action would be taken.

Montgomery asked what options were available to the board, and Thompson said any options under Nebraska Revised Statutes 79 regarding school personnel.

A handful of parents left. They said they were disappointed.

Those who stayed told the board they are worried that students don’t have a neutral person to confide in, since the superintendent, high school principal/activities director and wrestling coach have been cited, and the school counselor is married to the high school principal.

“What if they don’t feel safe going to administrators?” Montgomery said.

Twarling said he was offended by the question.

“I apologize. I didn’t mean to offend you,” Montgomery said. “We’re just trying to look out for the well-being of the kids.”

“Who could they go to?” a woman asked. “Is there a neutral person to talk to? If a student has a problem, who is their advocate and their voice? If something happens now or two weeks from now, who do they talk to?”

The board promised to consider it.

“We don’t know right now,” board member Bob Keller said. “We’ll figure it out and we’ll get back to you.”

“Four of us have kids in the school,” Meyer said. “We don’t know but we will work with the administration to figure it out.”

After the meeting, one parent who asked not to be identified said there is a long-standing concern that bullying between students is sometimes improperly addressed at the school, and that intimidation might be hampering full disclosure of the child abuse allegations.

Before the regular meeting ended, Twarling said Maxwell students have generally scored well on Nebraska standardized tests. Those scores and scores on the American College Test (ACT) are above the norm in most categories. He said he’d have a full report at the next board meeting in October.

At the end of the regular meeting, Twarling unexpectedly asked for a closed session to discuss his contract.

The board closed the door again for 30 minutes. They returned to open session at 10:17 p.m. only to adjourn the meeting.

The three Maxwell school officials are officially charged with failure "to make a report of child abuse or neglect" to law enforcement or to the Nebraska Health and Human Services department, according to the Nebraska State Patrol. The charge is a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of three months in jail and a $500 fine.

Twarling, 61, is in his second year as the Maxwell superintendent. He is a former director of human resources for the North Platte School District, and a principal at North Platte High.


This report was corrected Wednesday morning. The woman who asked the question "Where could they go to?" did not identify herself.


Like this story to send to your facebook

The North Platte Bulletin - Published 9/18/2012
Copyright © 2012 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
I am really curious, why is it that officers of the law can't question a child without a parent present, but officials at the school can with there investigation, are they above the law? Perhaps they were just getting kids on the right thought process, can you say manipulation?
0
Posted by maxalum    - 9/29/2012 11:44:02 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

NebraskaLand National BankYou've got a
facebook Request!
CLICK HERE!

REBBIE... I don't know if abuse took place or not, but the reason for the citations is that school staff were given information about a 'possible' case of abuse. They should have immediately notified the appropriate agencies, not investigated it themselves. IF something happened and the victim was called into the principles office and put on the spot I can understand why he would deny it. This victim did make some kind of initial statement that proposed abuse. If the accusations were completely unfounded I suppose he could have been charged with false reporting. Since nothing like that has taken place to him or anyone else, I would speculate that there is some truth to the accusations. Just remember that if you hear about possible abuse you have to contact the proper authorities. If you heard your neighbor was beating his kids would you go ask him? I doubt it...you would contact the police. That is where these school personnel erred. They took it upon themselves to 'investigate' possible abuse rather than turning it over to the police and/or HHS. Too many school officials believe that their 'power' is greater than it really is. These 3 should have called in the proper people and the victim taken to Bridge of Hope.
0
Posted by sensible    - 9/26/2012 12:59:51 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Sensible, according to the lawyers, the "victim" said this did not happen! That's the issue that I have. They are saying it's not true, but a 3rd party says that her son saw it happen. But when the admin. asked the victim, and the victim's mom; they both denied it happened and said it was a rumor.
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/25/2012 3:15:16 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

So mom, the person most responsible for the safety of her child, gets a pass but the administration does not?
0
Posted by Northplatypus    - 9/25/2012 9:44:29 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

I know if a child of mine came home with such a story I would have called the police not the school. But if the woman who reported it was the victims mom she did contact the school perhaps thinking that was what she should do. I don't know why she didn't go to the authorities unless she thought thte school was the 'authorities'. I don't know what she was thinking. However if she had gone to the police first and the investigation found out that students had gone to the administration and the coach and no report was made these people would still have been cited.
0
Posted by sensible    - 9/25/2012 8:40:18 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Isn't that the parent's number one priority, the safety and security of their child? Shouldn't the mother be held to a higher standard of protecting her child than the school board?
0
Posted by Northplatypus    - 9/25/2012 7:07:45 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

It isn't the question of whether the abuse was founded or unfounded the situation involves the fact that incidents of abuse were reported to those in charge and it was their legal obligation to turn those reports into the appropriate agencies for them to do the investigating. School personnel do not conduct the investigation. Those cited were cited for failure to report. IT doesn't matter if it happened or not they did not report the 'possibility' of abuse. If the appropriate agencies investigated and found that the abuse did or didn't happen they would then take the appropriate actions.These individuals were cited after a warrent was granted and records were reviewed. They were not cited on the word of any one individual. The board apparently decided to ignore the law as well as the NDE's code of conduct and ethics. The individuals should have at least been suspended pending further investigation. The boards failure to take any action shows their disregard for the safety and security of the students...their number one priority. They could find themselves facing charges from the NEbraska board of education which can step in when a local board fails to do their job. I would suggest that those concerned contact the NDE and lodge a complaint, that is if you really want action and aren't just blogging your frustrations. All formal complaints HAVE to be properly investigated. You can also contact the ACLU.
0
Posted by sensible    - 9/24/2012 10:52:20 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Geez, I thought this story was dead. As for the "many" that disagree with the administration and stand for "rightousness". There must have been a different meeting than the one that I attended. Supposedly they had rounded up enough people to fill the school gym and it was accordingly set aside. If you ask me, the meeting could have been held in one of the schools vestibules.
0
Posted by maxdude    - 9/24/2012 5:53:07 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Yes maxalum many share your feelings! They truely are only Sunday christians! Different story for the rest of the week. I think sunday is also questionable!
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/24/2012 2:55:52 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I was just wondering how everyone can claim this stuff never happened when there are so many witnesses that have reported it to the school. Just because people have been threatened to keep their mouths shut and are scared to come forward now does not mean the ones threatening are innocent. As for the good christians on the board and working at the school, I think God would want you to look out for His children, perhaps they are only christians for show.
0
Posted by maxalum    - 9/23/2012 10:16:59 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Maybe we could all borrow rose colored glasses. The description of the board and loyal (really!) secretary is classic, but not quite how many, many others would describe the same individuals, but by all means, stand your ground and defend those that you believe in. The rest of us will stand ground for the students.
0
Posted by speedrACER69    - 9/21/2012 5:02:59 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Mom10, I personally understand your point. Yes, the kids should always come first, and if the child that they say is the victim did indeed say something happened, then I'm sure this would have been handled by the authorities. I think this is such an unusual case because the "victim" insists it didn't happen. This has been reported by the papers and by many first hand sources. It'll be interesting to see how the courts handle this, since it's not your average assault allegation.
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/21/2012 11:00:09 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Once again totally off the true subject. Just sad for all.
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/21/2012 10:18:55 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Sane logic by "Logical". I want to know more about this "hard drinking" "good ol boys club"? The school board is made up of a woman, (2) hardline Baptists, a staunch Pentacostal and two regular guys that I have never seen with a drink in their hand. I enjoy adult beverages, yet knowing Boucher over (15) years, I have never been invited to play golf, play cards nor have I ever had a beer with the guy. I am really feeling out of the loop. As for the oft-critised secretary of thirty plus years. She has a major character flaw, LOYALTY. I have known and been put in my place more than once by this "secretary". I find myself respecting someone who will take a bullet for her boss and loves Maxwell School more than anyone I know.
0
Posted by maxdude    - 9/21/2012 10:06:55 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

So let me understand this. The only people who seem to bring up anyone being fired are the be logical, dont judge people. If you are a parent in Maxwell and ask any questions,you are suddenly a mob. At the last Maxwell School Board meeting the parents really only asked 2 questions. #1 What if any action would be taken by the school board? Answer: None #2 Who are the children suppose to go to if they have a problem, feel unsafe,bullied. Answer #1 I am offended #2 Sit down and shut up #3 Take your kids else where. #4 We will get back to you on that The only issue right now is the failure to report. None of the rest has come in to play yet.When a child is involved you ALWAYS error on the side of the child, they always come first. It is sad that if a parent has a simple question, they suddenly are a problem. Parents have the right to question. I think EVERYONE was put in a no win situation!But if they had reported(which they have said they did not)they would have been out of the mix! Thats why these agencies are in place! If you can not see that the parents with questions are 100% pro school, that is sad. If they did not want that school to survive they would not bother to show up. Its time to let the people trained to investigate and handle this do what they need to do! The only issue right now is DID THEY FAIL TO REPORT! The only issue.
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/21/2012 9:13:54 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Some people have way too much time on their hands. And logical? I think not.
0
Posted by Northplatypus    - 9/21/2012 8:06:14 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

So let's think about this. The alleged victim says that this did not happen. The three school employees are fired and then found innocent of the charges and then later sue the school for dismissing them for no reason. Maxwell district is sued for hundreds of thousands if not into the millions of dollars. OK based upon the budget story below the Maxwell district is bumping up against its budget lid or whatever and will have to go to a vote for a budget override. The mob that is pushing the guilty until proven innocent decides that they are still correct and decides not to pass the override and the school defaults on their obligation. Two options consolidate with Brady, they don't want our debt and can't afford us. North Platte has unused budget authority and takes us over, now the Maxwell district is the North Platte School District that won't let kids option to smaller districts. Win for North Platte. But hey Boucher got fired!!!!
0
Posted by logical?    - 9/20/2012 9:44:49 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I guess only rebbie is suprised that the attorneys for the school are going to defend them, Im pretty sure that would be thier job. The only thing that matters is the children! No nonsense from adults just the children.
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/20/2012 2:05:33 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Go back to the beginning...a person reported to a teacher that a student had been assaulted (doesn't matter where). That teacher MUST report to law enforcement. The school is not suppose to investigate.
0
Posted by tiger4    - 9/20/2012 1:01:15 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

And Mom10, I didn't bring up the fb nonsense. And you are accusing me of being rude? Again, read the prior statements to make sense of mine, thanks.
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/20/2012 12:52:23 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

MOM10 - Go back and read the articles in the npbulletin and nptelegraph where the LAWYERS said that the Victim and his mother said it NEVER happened. I do not make things up, thank you.
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/20/2012 12:49:12 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

No one but you has EVER said the victim is not telling the truth! Shame on you! You would have to be insane not to know that this YOUNG person is in a situation that they can not win. No matter what they say they will be wrong! Some one will have a problem with it.This is WHY the adults have to stand up for the KIDS! No one cares about the football nonsense but you! Take care of the children not the adults!
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/20/2012 12:41:22 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I'm rude and disrespectful for defending myself against Emerson's rude comment? Really? I'll tell you what is disrespectful. People jumping to conclusions and assuming the worst before they even know the facts. To assume that 1 person on the board who was talking to someone at a fb game would avoid moral responsibility because of a fb friendship. I am only trying to speak up for the VICTIM who said nothing happened. period. But all you people want to do is believe the victim in lying. Shame on All of You!
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/20/2012 11:48:40 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Rebbie this may be over your head so I will try to make this easy for you. None of us would be having these conversations had the administration followed the law instead of thier personal policies. Things would have been dealt with by the people who are trained to investigate and no one would have had to second quess why this has turned out the way it has.It seems that the only people being rude are the pro administration people, the others are simply asking questions and the only response you seem to be able to use is to be rude and disrespectful. This seems to be what has gotten this school in the mess it is in.
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/20/2012 10:49:50 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

It's just that my point is way over your head.
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/20/2012 10:27:27 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I think someone is missing the point and talking in rhynme.
0
Posted by Emerson    - 9/20/2012 10:23:10 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

And, Mom10, I do not have a personal stake in this, my kids don't even attend Maxwell, I just don't think it's morally right to drag everyone's name through the mud based on where you sit during a football game. so sad!
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/20/2012 10:21:21 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

The school based their findings on a probable FACT, not a probable RUMOR. And wildcat, I have fb friends who I was bullied by in school; so your fb theory is blown to bits, lol! Definition: Probable facts These are statements which it seems reasonable to believe are true, but you are not able to prove yourself, either because you do not have access to the information or because you do not have time to dig for proof (but not because you are too lazy to check). Probable facts include statements by people who are in a position to know the truth and who have no obvious reason to tell a lie. If the Finance Minister tells Parliament that $10 million was raised from taxes last year, you can treat this as a probable fact. These are not, however, the same as proven facts. Although they are probably true, there is a chance that they might be wrong, either because a mistake has been made or because someone lied. Because this doubt exists, we must attribute probable facts to the people who provide them.
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/20/2012 10:15:58 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Rebbie, Rebbie, Rebbie... You must know Mr. Keller very well, so you must also know that he DOES NOT talk to everyone, but he is a Facebook friend with one of the alleged perpetrators. The line between teacher/board member and student has always been very hazy. I for one do not know if these incidents happened or not, but I do believe in our law enforcement and I do not believe they would have cited the Maxwell administration without just cause.
0
Posted by wildcat    - 9/20/2012 10:10:53 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Rebbie I realize you have a personal stake in this but Bob Keller IS NOT a friendly man who speaks to everyone and no one is trying to say anything except that they WERE informed that something happened they DID NOT turn it in.
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/20/2012 10:10:20 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I dont think that it is a matter of if it did or didnt happen. It is law by letter education certification to immediatly turn over any alleged reports to authorities immediatly. and as I stated there was enough probably cause to ticket the administration. The real truth is out of our hands, as it should be. But this should be a lesson to all school administration that these things need to be handled according to governing law.
0
Posted by Emerson    - 9/20/2012 9:58:31 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Emerson: If the alleged victim says it's not true and that it's an ugly rumor, then there is no reasonable cause to contact authorities: We are not talking about an 8 year old here, we're talking about a high school student who says NOTHING happened! Now, if he said that it was true, then they would have had to contact authorities. The court will have to decide if a rumor was reasonable cause. Code Section 28-710-717 Reasonable cause to believe that a child has been subjected to abuse or neglect or observes child being subjected to conditions and circumstances which would reasonably result in abuse or neglect
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/20/2012 9:43:56 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Yes Rebbie, That appears to be what the law states. They have had enough evidence to issues citations after several months of investigations. Its too bad the school administration just didnt do what was needed in the first place, Wether true or not the school should have followed law and procedure.
0
Posted by Emerson    - 9/20/2012 9:21:41 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

So, let me get this straight: If person C tells the school that person A was violated and the school brings in person A to ask about the violation, and person A says it isn't true and nothing happened to him, would the school call the police for a RUMOR? The only time the school has to call the police is if a person is suspected of being abused (bruised, etc.) or if they come forward and say that such "rumor" is true. And "wildcat", Bob Keller talks to EVERYONE! Yes, he is friendly and speaks to all, because he sits next to someone, that makes him guilty of not doing his job? Because you speak to your boss out of work, does that mean your boss wouldn't fire you? The slippery slope logic of your talkback is ridiculous! To ASSUME someone would break the law because they sit next to them at a game is in itself, a rumor! Thanks for spreading another one!
0
Posted by REBBIE    - 9/20/2012 9:04:15 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I don't think anyone that lives in the Maxwell community will be surprised that the Maxwell School Board didn't take any action. Bob Keller and Doug Whisenhunt are personal friends of Aub Boucher. You can see Mr. Keller sitting with Mr. Boucher at every single football game at Maxwell. Mr. Whisenhunt has Mr. & Mrs. Boucher watch his child. Do you actually think these board members are going to make these adminstrators responsible for their actions. The law is they MUST report any allegations of abuse to the authorities and they did not!!! That is the bottom line, and I can guarantee if it would have been another person that is not in the Good Ol' Boys of Maxwell Club things would have been different. I am hoping the NSAA does something to these individuals, because it is obvious that the Maxwell School Board will not!
0
Posted by wildcat    - 9/20/2012 8:17:50 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

From the Nebraska Department of Education- Code of Professional Ethics Chapter 27 003.02B Shall not commit any crime involving moral turpitude or any felony under the laws of the United States or any state or territory, and shall not have a misdemeanor conviction involving abuse, neglect, or sexual misconduct as defined in Sections 003.12 through 003.14 of 92 NAC 21. 004.02C Shall not use coercive means, or promise or provide special treatment to students,colleagues, school patrons, or school board members in order to influence professional decisions. 004.02D Shall not make any fraudulent statement or fail to disclose a material fact for which the educator is responsible. 004.02E Shall not exploit professional relationships with students, colleagues, parents, school patrons, or school board members for personal gain or private advantage. For more you can go to http://www.education.ne.gov/legal/webrulespdf/RULE27FINAL.pdf As parents or guardians of children within NE schools, we should have some knowledge of the information within this document. You can address your concerns to the NDE and by pass the local board in hopes of avoiding the ‘relationship’ of board memebers to those involved. Remember that school employees are our employees. It is our tax dollars that pay their wages. All too often they forget that fact. So, as responsible employers, it is our job to keep tabs on our employees and weed out those who are non-productive or an outright danger to the success of our product…which just happens to be our children. “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke
0
Posted by sensible    - 9/20/2012 7:18:38 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Perhaps instead of parents having to pull students from their local school (as yelled by the presumptous secretary), staff in general, should be looked at being replaced. May be time for new blood in the system.Not to say that all the staff is bad because that is not the case.
0
Posted by speedrACER69    - 9/19/2012 7:43:03 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Tax payers of Maxwell did you notice that in the same meeting your board members refused to answer your questions, your secretary yelled out to take your children else where and they refused to take any action, they also raised your taxes so you can pay more for them to refuse to do thier jobs.
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/19/2012 5:49:00 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Kudos to big red fan on the "can you say Good Ol Boy's club"????" Did not take GI school districe long to deal with their issue...What is being held over over these people???? remember THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE
0
Posted by bisongirl79    - 9/19/2012 5:28:36 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Kudos to Mr. Montgomery and the others who questioned the boards decision. Disappointed with the outcome of the meeting? Yes. Surprised? No.
0
Posted by speedrACER69    - 9/19/2012 5:07:09 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

They HAVE TO REPORT IT, plan and simple. They didn't. They got a ticket for not reporting, which they are required legally to do. The school is NOT suppose to investigate. They will be lucky if they don't get charged with obstructing justice at this point.
0
Posted by tiger4    - 9/19/2012 10:41:59 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Bullying there was going on 35 yrs ago I lived it. You really don't feel like you have anyone to turn to. Everyone knows everything about everybody and what they don't know they make up. I still see names from years gone by, just keeps following generation after generation. If this did happen I can understand why the victim is acting this way, if he is still in school it will be a year of hell for him no matter what. That town never forgets..don't get me wrong it happens in all schools but it seems the smaller the community the worse it is, just my opinion.
0
Posted by serious    - 9/19/2012 8:10:43 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

This is a witchhunt, plain and simple. Look at the comments on the last two stories, people who know nothing about the situation screaming hysterically for blood. You people should be ashamed of yourselves.
0
Posted by are you kidding?    - 9/19/2012 8:08:15 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

Can I assume that since NP farms kids out to Hershey and Maxwell that the road goes both ways? If students are being treated so horribly there, why are parents continuing to send their kids?
0
Posted by Northplatypus    - 9/19/2012 8:06:18 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

They're probably just doing nothing because of what they may know about the police investigation. Why would they fire these guys when they know that criminal charges might be over the horizon? Might as well just let justice be served.
0
Posted by Mike    - 9/19/2012 7:53:45 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

I understand friends and family defending these men. Who wants to believe who you love could be this stupid!I really believe that Mr. Twarling wasnt given all the details,I 100% believe that he would have never allowed this to happen. The other 2 I think knew something was going on,maybe not realizing to what extent,but they knew something.Wasnt this coach excused from the baseball legion??I wonder if this young man just wants this over, and that is why he is saying nothing happened.But then also, this is a juvenile, why do we know so much information about him? Shouldnt it be kept hush, how do you think he feels?I've had parents that go to Maxwell say there is horrible bullying,and if your parents are not in the adult drinking crowd,than your better off keeping your mouth shut.A couple adults that I know (their kids are involved)use to be horrible bullies and still kinda are as adults.I feel so bad for the family,and also the kids not involved.
0
Posted by WHATSUP    - 9/18/2012 9:48:22 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Is there, or is there not a video of the assault? If there is, guilty as charged I think. If there isn't. Shut up and stop stirring the pot.
0
Posted by gerald    - 9/18/2012 6:45:14 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

maxdude your attitude might cause people to think you may have been in the room
0
Posted by mom10    - 9/18/2012 5:54:37 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Concerned2, you speak of this allegation in the "first person", were you in that room in Kearney? It is obvious now that there never was a "video". All of you under-achievers that have never accomplished anything in your sorry little lives other than pro-create, find someone or something else to drag down.
0
Posted by maxdude    - 9/18/2012 5:45:44 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

concerned2 , There is "NO" proof that anything was done,the video has not turned up,the supposed victim and his mother have both said nothing happened, all other parties involved have said it did not happen so if it did not happen then they can not punish them just because the were Charged does not mean that it happened we need to wait for this to go through the courts then if they are guilty of something take action we can all set in judgement and say this or that should be done
0
Posted by nebred    - 9/18/2012 4:55:16 PM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

Something needs to be done with these administrators. They did not do their job of protecting the children in their school. They may have followed school protocol in dealing with discipline issues, but what these young men did, is illegal! It is the job of these administrators to protect the children, and they did not do that. One of these young men who is accused wants to go to school to be a teacher. I sure hope that something happens before he starts teaching our children.
0
Posted by concerned2    - 9/18/2012 3:31:58 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

I guess you'd have to if you couldn't say There's NOTHING Here. I mean honestly, do you really believe every board member and their attorneys are going to sweep something like that under the rug and put all their jobs on the line to cover up for a kid? I don't care whose kid it is.
0
Posted by Northplatypus    - 9/18/2012 3:27:34 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

can u say "good ol boys club"?
0
Posted by big red fan    - 9/18/2012 2:34:01 PM
(0 current warnings - 10 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back

Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 


Copyright © 2003 - 2013 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 54.224.75.101
North Platte, Nebraska