Log In | Register   
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

Mr. Handsome: Unfortunately, you can't just make stuff up

Gambs: Talk is cheap; free speech isn't: Part 2

More opinion

Ag News

Russia bars Grand Island beef, pathogen blamed

Group to meet at Halsey, goal to improve ranch business

More Ag News


       
 
Email Article | Print Article
News - Local News
 
Matlock attorney files motion to preclude testimony, use of the word Tell North Platte what you think
 
Photo by File photo
Amiria "Braka" Matlock

The defense attorney for Amiria “Braka” Matlock wants to preclude the state from referring to the man Matlock is accused of killing as a “victim.”

NebraskaLand National BankFREE Mobile Banking NOW AVAILABLE!

In a motion filed in Lincoln County District Court on Friday, July 17, attorney Jim Paloucek said the word ‘victim’ is unfairly prejudicial.

He cited the Ohio case "State v. Wright", where a trial court was ordered to refrain from using the word “victim” before the state has proven a victim truly exists.

Matlock is charged with manslaughter for the death of Greg Styles after an altercation at Kelsey’s Place bar. Matlock allegedly hit Styles in the face. Styles fell, struck his head hard on the floor, was knocked unconscious and taken to Great Plains Regional Medical Center by ambulance where he died, according to police records.

In defending Matlock, Paloucek also seeks to preclude any testimony from a prime witness that night -- Dennis A. Dushaw Jr.

Paloucek said that Dushaw’s recollection of the events of that night is severely limited by the amount of alcohol he had consumed.

Dushaw’s sworn deposition testimony included that he was “…so drunk that (he) can’t remember what happened…” according to the motion.

Paloucek wrote that Dushaw’s level of uncertainty about what actually transpired is high enough that he is not comfortable with a jury making a decision based on his testimony.

Paloucek said Dushaw never saw Matlock’s fist hit Styles, or anyone else, that night and Dushaw only concluded that Styles had been punched when he saw him on the ground.

He said allowing testimony from Dushaw would be unfairly prejudicial.

The motion further seeks to disallow any evidence of a phone call between Matlock and North Platte Police Officer Steve Reeves on March 29, 2008 other than an audio recording of the conversation itself. Paloucek said in motion that the recording itself is the best evidence of the content of the call.

He also asked the court to order the state to produce the audio recording of the entire phone conversation.

The motion asks the court to preclude any testimony or evidence, including medical evidence, that used words like “hit”, “punch”, “struck”, “fight”, or “altercation,” except for evidence or testimony that is based on the declarant’s personal knowledge.

Matlock’s defense also wants the court to allow them to take trial depositions from physicians who treated Stiles. These physicians include Dr. Deborah Weaver of the emergency room at Great Plains Regional Medical Center and Dr. Adeleke E. Badejo of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Kearney.

The motion argued that the expense of paying for the doctors to appear in person is prohibitive, but their testimony is critical to their case.


The crime

Matlock allegedly hit Styles after a confrontation according to the police.

A police spokesman said after Matlock hit Styles in the face, Styles fell and struck his head hard on the floor. He was knocked unconscious and taken to Great Plains Regional Medical Center by ambulance.

Styles, 38, was transported to Good Samaritan Hospital in Kearney and kept alive for three days as he was an organ donor. He died March 31 after he was removed from life support.

Styles’ body was taken to Scottsbluff for an autopsy, according to the police.

Lincoln County Attorney Rebecca Harling said then that the pathologist’s preliminary finding was that Styles died from blunt force trauma to his head.

The police were called to the bar at 11:27 p.m. that night, according to investigators. Witnesses said Styles and Matlock had a short confrontation when Matlock allegedly turned and struck Styles in the head, knocking him to the floor.

Matlock was charged with manslaughter, which carries a maximum sentence of 20-years imprisonment. He posted a $30,000 bond.

Manslaughter is charged in Nebraska when a suspect kills another without malice on a sudden quarrel or causes the death of another unintentionally. Manslaughter is generally charged when prosecutors can’t prove that the death was intentional.


 
The North Platte Bulletin - Published 7/18/2009
Copyright © 2009 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
well, coming from the south and being of " mixed blood" blacks would much rather be called " blacks,or colored or even just plain negro than the degrading "Ni**er) word. That is as degrading to them as calling a Mexican/ Spanish person a " wetback". They were BOTH at fault--I didn''t care for Styles making raciest comments about black and whites being Zebras-or his other slurs abt blacks.-what are Mexicans and whites called who marry? I just hope that there is a FAIR JUDGE AND JURY and none of them are racist. It was after all an ACCIDENT --Braka ONLY hit him ONCE-&-he didn''t use anything but his fist. May God be with you and direct the judge and Jury.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by mississipi_blueyes    - 7/23/2009 10:29:42 PM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

NebraskaLand National Bank FREE Mobile Banking NOW AVAILABLE!

First of all any of you on here that grew up in this town that actually "grew up" with Braka know what kind of person he is. He is the type of person that will absolutely walk away when he can it is when he is pushed passed the point of no return that he won''t walk away from, just like any other person would do. We all have our breaking points and on that particular evening in question unfortunately the wrong comments were made and the wrong words were used and that point of no return was crossed by both parties involved. Second point, Paloucek is moving to strike using the word victim because in this case there are actually two victims one of a horrific racial slur that was repeated to the point of violence and one that becuase of that racial slur and several other names isn''t here to defend himself. Third point the point of a trial is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the points of the crime fit the punishment for that crime therefore if indeed the intent wasn''''t to kill someone then it doesn''t automatically mean they need to fry in the electric chair or have a needle shoved in their arm or spend the rest of their life behind bars. Tempers flair and because of this accidents do occur this is why once the jury has made their decision and if it is a guilty verdict the judge has to look at past cases that have set precidence to determine what the punishment should be. My last point why is it that every time something is brought up in court someone has to bring up an accident that four off duty police officers were involved in??? People that was seven years ago and the people involved in that re-live it every day of their lives and you feel the need to bring it up every time someone else goes to court? Seriously not every case is the same they are all based on different circumstances a fight in a bar doesn''t have anything to do with that car accident and the circumstances surrounding that trial so why mention it, to open old wounds?? Focus on this trial and what Paloucek is doing for his client rather than what Lindemeier did for his.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Sapphire    - 7/22/2009 7:51:38 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Trust me there was more involved than just the color of skin. Braka knows why Greg was lipping off to him that night. All actions deserve a consequence, Greg obviously paid his, lets see if Braka will do the same.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by lotsoflove    - 7/22/2009 10:30:10 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Braka was a good man. I can''t believe that all of you people think that he did this with intent. He was called a N**ger.....and I cant say that I blame him at all for defending himself. It sounds to me like Greg just didnt like Braka for the color of his skin and wanted to make it known. All-together it is a true tragedy for both sides. Let us all pray**
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by wunderwhy    - 7/21/2009 9:12:10 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Sensible, I gotta hand you one thing. In my opinion, humble as it may be, you live up to your moniker 99.99999% of the time. That last point was priceless. Let''s just see if the justice system sees past the badge that killed. Will be interesting. For all the years I''ve known Braka, albeit only on a passing basis, I''ve never known him to be violent or brutal.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by 1coolmom    - 7/21/2009 2:51:49 PM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

I love the "if you don''t have anything nice to say," attitude that is portrayed here, but may I suggest that we change that to if you don''t have anything nice to say that agrees with our opinion than you should keep it to yourself? Or would that be just a little too much for some of us to bear?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by outsider II    - 7/21/2009 1:32:25 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

If anyone knows Braka, he is such a great person and a wonderful father. He has suffered enough with all of this. If you cant say anything nice about an individual then keep your comments to yourself. We are here for you Braka and sending our thoughts and prayers. Good luck and God Bless!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by bjbf79    - 7/21/2009 12:17:53 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Good luck Braka! There are alot of us who are 100% behind you!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Ace    - 7/21/2009 7:25:56 AM
(0 current warnings - 6 warnings total)

Should this man recieve any stiffer penalty than the off duty cop who, while driving drunk, killed 2 other off duty officers? By the definition of ''manslaughter'' in the Nebraska statutes, he too, committed the crime but did no time. I could find nothing that defined ''manslaughter'' based on profession, social status, race, creed, or sex. So why should the two incidents be treated so differently?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sensible    - 7/20/2009 11:21:04 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

I''ll give you that, one racist epithet gains its power from slavery, the other from the Jim Crowe south. I suppose one is worse than the other, but both are still racist. You can say whatever you want on talkback use either for all i care, but when you point out the history of one while nonchalantly employing the other, well that''s called irony and i can''t not point that out ;)
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by outsider    - 7/20/2009 9:17:30 AM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

I don''t know Braka at all, that being said...when you go to a bar, typically you go there to drink, some have become 10 ft tall and bulletproof and you take the chance of getting into a confrontation. Both parties were at fault, if I were on the jury, I would deem this an accident. Braka did not continue to beat on the guy after he was down, he didn''t drag his hiney outside after he was down, etc. The great thing about living in this country is laws are there protect us all.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by intheno    - 7/20/2009 7:27:31 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Braka may be a nice guy sometimes and at different points in his life but I also know he runs his mouth about being able to have any mans wife etc etc. He''s not the Angel some try to make him out to be. He didn''t mean to kill the big mouth in the bar, but he did. That''s why it''s called manslaughter and not murder. If the roles were reversed and some black dude called a white guy a cracker and the white guy did this, no one would have a problem saying the word "cracker" and jesse jackson and al sharpton woulda been here screaming racism because a poor innocent black man was Murdered, not manslaughter. The fact is, he accidentally killed a man which by hitting him because he was pissed off. This is the definition of manslaughter. People get called names all the time but most don''t hit a man and cause him to hit his head and die. Get over it.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by wizdumb    - 7/20/2009 6:21:54 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

Someone might want to brush up on their legal knowledge before posting. Even if Braka wanted to ''hurt'' Styles, Braka is justifiably charged with manslaughter because the intent to KILL/MURDER was not present.

All in all several of you are right, taking matters into your own hands is not always a good thing to do; however, what about accountability for Styles? This also sends a message that maybe one should think twice before be harassing and running your mouth. It goes both ways. Yes, the other man involved might still be here today if Braka had not hit him; however, if Styles hadn''t harassed Braka continually Styles might still be here today as well. Don''t martyr either one as both contributed to the end results.

Report Talk Back AbusePosted by myview    - 7/20/2009 5:51:46 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

outsider, go back outside. trust me, i think colored is a little more respective, dont you? besides that, he is a friend of mine. what would you rather i say? thats what is wrong with the world today. ignorance
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by wannabe07    - 7/19/2009 8:50:38 PM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

''you don''t call a colored man a N'' - you also don''t call them ''colored''. LMAO. This whole discussion is pointless. It will go before a jury and they''ll decide based on the facts whether it was or was not manslaughter just as it should be decided.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by outsider    - 7/19/2009 2:34:04 PM
(0 current warnings - 5 warnings total)

Surgeons assessing viability is not the same as an autopsy.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Agatha    - 7/19/2009 11:33:29 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I question why the county prosecutor allowed Styles'' body to still be used for organ donorship. If organs were removed, the autopsy was incomplete. The surgeons removing organs might be able to make judgments about the viability of the organs, but that is the same as being part of an autopsy. There can be underlying causes of death despite the blunt force trauma. Why create any possible room for doubt?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Agatha    - 7/19/2009 11:32:05 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

He is being charged with manslaughter, not murder. I would consider myself lucky if I was him because he hit the guy with the intention to hurt him. The court system has to send out a message that taking matters into your own hands without regard to the end result merits jail time. Guilty is my prediction with a 3 to 5 sentence. He should consider himself lucky, at least he doesn''t have the sentence imposed on the other guy. He should have known better. I always tell my kids KEEP YOUR HANDS TO YOURSELF. Hmmmmm, seems like those words apply to adults too.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by cscscs007    - 7/19/2009 10:29:20 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I, too, know Braka, and he was always polite and considerate. I have seen him walk away from many a fight and calm done situations that could have turned bad. I feel so sad that this has happened. I also know Styles and have seen him cause alot of problems in public. Though it is sad that he died, I do not think putting Braka in jail ''serves'' justice. It would be nothing more than vengence. I know he feels awful about what happened, but the death was not intentional. I can''t say the same about the remarks from Styles. Just because you do not like someone, what ever the reason you should not make personal attacks, especially racial. This incident is the result of prejudice and ignorance. One family has lost a husband, father, brother, son. What purpose would be served to do the same to another. Give Braka probation, counseling, anger management or what ever but jail time serves no positive purpose.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sensible    - 7/19/2009 9:49:02 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

This is all a very sad situation for everyone involved. I don''t know either of these fellas, but Mr. Matlock still chose to hit the other man. Granted, he was being taunted, but he is old enough to know that striking back is not the way to handle the situation, no matter what the man was saying to him. I am sure he is wishing he had just walked away. He does deserve some kind of punishment and may he and others will learn from his mistake.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Friendly One    - 7/19/2009 9:45:20 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

sweetpea-to you all I have to say is you are right...sticks and stones may break your bones,but in your case,cement would pay homeage to tradition.Obviously you know nothing about Braka.Otherwise you would know that he truly is the definition of "Gentle Giant".Provocation,in any instance,is ALWAYS wrong.No exceptions.So go back to your rock and crawl back under it.As far as Braka is concerned,I hope justice truly does prevail here and it is realised that this truly was nothing more than a tragic accident.Nothing more.We miss your influence in the neighborhood.Come home soon.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Badger    - 7/19/2009 7:32:54 AM
(1 current warnings - 15 warnings total)

I do not see the need to say negative things about either party involved. It is a tragic event that has changed the lives of many. Styles left behind a family that loved him very much. His father is a very good man and I would feel horrible if he had to read some of the awful things that people post.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by npmommy    - 7/19/2009 7:28:20 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

this is a tragedy. he never intended for it to turn out this way. i cant recall how many fights i have seen at the bar or elsewhere where this could possibly been the outcome. very unusual for it to turn this way. just another reason for people to not drink as we all seem to become mouthy and stronger. i am behind you and your family Braka. you are a good person just an unfortunate event. could have happened to many others.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by abc123    - 7/19/2009 7:18:05 AM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

Baraka sounds like you have an attorney that is at the least, putting in a good effort. Good luck FRIEND. Prayers Be With You!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by eagle eye    - 7/19/2009 4:38:42 AM
(0 current warnings - 8 warnings total)

Well said Wannabe07...Braka also earned my respect many years ago and i would do anything for him as he is a true friend. You are in my thoughts EVERY day Braka!!!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by growup    - 7/19/2009 2:32:42 AM
(0 current warnings - 35 warnings total)

it doesnt matter who wants to take their low blows now. Braka knows who is behind him and that is all that matters. the only comment i have to make is do you not think he doesnt hurt everyday? dont you think he wishes he could go back and take that night back? Braka is a great person who was pushed too far by a jerk that continued to follow him and run his mouth repeatedly. just how far do expect to push someone before its going to hit?? you do not call a colored man a "N" and not expect some sort of retaliation, especially over and over again. good luck, Braka, you are a great man and you have earned my respect years ago.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by wannabe07    - 7/19/2009 12:49:22 AM
(0 current warnings - 3 warnings total)

sweetpea...maybe you were just an annoying little twerp when you were younger. I have known Braka for about 30 years and have seen him bad and good. I have NEVER seen Braka start a fight of any kind though, he will stick up for himself as he should! the last person that called him that "N" word was laid out also. That was about 20 years ago at a hotel in town. That person also deserved what he got!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by growup    - 7/19/2009 12:28:42 AM
(0 current warnings - 35 warnings total)

sweetpea...If someone did what said to me what Styles said I would have laid him out just as fast!!! He let his mouth write a check his body could not cash! He has ALWAYS been a mouthy drunk, just this time someone stood up for their own rights and yes a tragic end but manslaughter...nope!!!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by growup    - 7/19/2009 12:23:04 AM
(0 current warnings - 35 warnings total)

sticks and stones remember you used to tease us all the time when we were kids braka....or did you forget been many many years ago...ohhhh maybe you just forgot or a little brain fryed...
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sweetpea    - 7/19/2009 12:18:35 AM
(0 current warnings - 9 warnings total)

yea good-luck to some-one that just couldnt keep his hands to himself...if he woulda kept his hands to him self this wouldnt of escalated to any injury or death...nahhhh no luck for you braka justice needs to be served onto you...
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sweetpea    - 7/19/2009 12:13:33 AM
(0 current warnings - 9 warnings total)

Behind you all the way Braka!!!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by growup    - 7/18/2009 10:19:24 PM
(0 current warnings - 35 warnings total)

Good luck Braka!!!!!!!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Mom2Sixpack    - 7/18/2009 6:42:10 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back

Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 


Copyright © 2003 - 2010 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 38.107.191.112
North Platte, Nebraska