Log In | Register   
HomeLocal NewsState NewsSportsOpinionObituariesAgriculture
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin

Marketplace
  Display Ads
  Classifieds
  Dir. of Advertisers

Opinion

Mr. Handsome: Unfortunately, you can't just make stuff up

Gambs: Talk is cheap; free speech isn't: Part 2

More opinion

Ag News

Russia bars Grand Island beef, pathogen blamed

Group to meet at Halsey, goal to improve ranch business

More Ag News


       
 
Email Article | Print Article
News - Local News
 
College reaches settlement with fired professorTell North Platte what you think
 
Courtesy
Deming Pan

A popular chemistry professor at Mid-Plains Community College resigned Tuesday after reaching a settlement with the college.

NebraskaLand National BankFREE Mobile Banking NOW AVAILABLE!

Dr. Deming Pan, a tenured chemistry professor at the North Platte campus, accepted the offer of the settlement Tuesday morning. A public hearing of her and the administration’s grievances before the college’s Board of Governors was called off.

Pan was removed from her classroom Feb. 20 and placed on administrative leave by Dr. Michael Chipps for insubordination.

The college accused Pan of violating the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act for sending three student’s records to an accreditation agency as a protest for what she believed was a “lowering of standards” for students. The college also accused Pan of denigrating her colleagues with her e-mail complaints.

Pan had requested a public hearing on the termination of her teaching contract and about 45 people were on hand for the hearing at the North Platte campus theatre Tuesday morning.

But North Platte attorney Dave Pederson, the board’s attorney, said that a tentative agreement had been negotiated the night before. He said that Pan agreed to withdraw her request for the hearing and resign. Pederson also said the board agreed to pay Pan’s salary and benefits through July 31 and pay Pan a settlement buyout of $10,000.

The settlement cost the college $43,682.34. That includes paying Pan the six months remaining on her existing contract or $33,682. It also includes a settlement buyout of her contract of $10,000. The college will also provide Pan all the benefits of her contract but did not provide a dollar amount for those.

In the settlement the board also agreed not to pursue Pan’s student record breach with the U.S. Attorney and provided Pan with a letter of recommendation from Chipps.

The letter said Pan received “consistently superior teaching evaluations and that she was “passionate about her discipline and a tireless advocate for high academic standards in chemistry.”

“Please consider her for any position which you have open,” Chipps said in the letter.

Both sides agreed not to communicate in any way in a “disparaging manner” regarding the college, its board, administrators, faculty or academic programs.

The board then went into executive session and discussed the matter.

Pan got the opportunity to air her grievances to the board during the closed executive meeting session.

After the board returned to an open meeting, they held a brief discussion over the controversy.

Board member Glenn Colson the board felt the $10,000 above and beyond Pan’s contract was the way to go.

Board member Ted Klug said there “were no winners” in the situation.

“We all lose something here today,” Klug said. He said he felt it was necessary to avoid legal battles but that he didn’t like the process.

Board member Roger Wilson said it was obvious Pan “had a passion for her students.” He wished her good luck in her future.

The board voted 9-1 to approve the agreement.

Elizabeth Benjamin, board chairperson, voted against the agreement. She said the board had not had a full hearing and that hers was an economic decision.

“The college should be all about the students,” Benjamin said. “All decisions should reflect dignity, respect and concern for the students.”

Pederson said the board felt the administration handled the Pan situation well.

Lincoln attorney Rick Wade, who represented Pan, said the settlement was in the best interest of Dr. Pan and the school.

Wade said Pan was able to address the board in executive session and advised the board keep the academic standards of MPCC at levels appropriate for college students.

Pederson also acknowledged that MPCC had been contacted by the National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission, the commission Pan reported the college to for allegedly lowering academic standards for the Nursing program and the Medical Laboratory Technology program.

Pederson said the administration has addressed that issue.


 
The North Platte Bulletin - Published 3/11/2009
Copyright © 2009 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
I don't mind reading it twice reasonableguy, cause you are so right. And as I pointed out once before, who is the attorney for the college? None other than Dave Pederson, husband of Judy, who is running employees off at the Spike and escorted Shelly Harshaw off the premises. I also remember when Dave Pederson, Stu Shepherd and 4 other school board members, included Dr. Paul Brochtrup, fired an excellent elementary school teacher because they were afraid the district would be sued by a psychotic mother and child. Dave and Judy, do you think if you just played by the rules, you might come out further ahead?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Friendly One    - 3/12/2009 11:46:23 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

NebraskaLand National Bank FREE Mobile Banking NOW AVAILABLE!

Hamjustice, thank you for putting it into that perspective. I do get the feeling that Dr. Chipps has a megalomaniac streak. But, I do agree with you on the passion that most if not all front line teachers have for their students. I do have some interaction with a few instructors from NPCC and they are all passionate about the work that they do. Outsider, I see what you are saying about speaking about a problem vs. making disparaging remarks. However, I would be surprised if Dr. Pan makes any remarks in the near future concerning the college's policies. Not only would she risk loseing the settelment but would face an civil battle that would in the end only benifit the lawyers involved. I would love to hear or read Dr. Pan's own words on this subject, I just don't think that is ever going to happen unless she writes an autobiography and waits 10-20 years to publish it.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Reasonableguy    - 3/12/2009 8:22:08 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

As usual, it seems that the art of settling, or plea bargaining immediately casts guilt upon the parties who enter the settlement. And yet, where is the derision for Dr. Deming taking the settlement? If Dr. Deming really believed that what she was doing was right, why not take the opportunity to show that at trial? The fact is people settle, because as you are all so quick to point out, taxpayers are not going to want to foot the bill for a lengthy and probably somewhat unnecessary prosecution of a civil or companion criminal case. There is nothing in this article that suggests that any sort of gag was put in place. Dr. Deming's settlement doesn't appear to be based upon her unwillingness to never speak of these matters again. She is only prevented from saying anything disparaging, but this does not necessarily mean that she can't point out flaws in the school's program. Disparaging, per the agreement, more likely means that she can't trash the program. Additionally, insubordination is a term used in termination of employment to encompass a variety of things, including outright refusal to conform to policies due to a conflicting opinion about those policies.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by outsider II    - 3/12/2009 6:25:58 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

If the college absolutely thought Dr. Pan did something wrong and they could prosecute her then WHY settle? What did they have to lose? If they would have prosecuted her and it turned out in their favor (which it probably never would have) they had the chance of regaining the confidence of the tax payer. However this ACT of giving her the rest of her contract + 10000 dollars shows to me (and most taxpayers in my opinion) that they were more worried about the public finding out the truth about what Dr. Pan was about to release. Some of you don't think that Dr. Pan received anything great but with the economic downturn we are in and an Administration that is going to get you out no matter what it takes a stunning letter of recommendation is worth quite a lot. She got her money and can go work somewhere else easily. Good thinking Dr. Pan. Too bad other Faculty and Administration did not back on you this to get the crusher (Dr. Chipps out and keep you in). My prayers are with you in finding a better job with Administration that care about their students and providing a quality education.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sweetNE    - 3/12/2009 5:43:40 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I agree, sensible. It's late...so I best make this my last post (for the evening). Reasonable, you raise a respectful and good question...and my answer is this: I know in my heart that the colleagues I work with are doing everything in their power to give their students 100% and the education they deserve and pay for. I don't have dealings with the entire MPCC structure, so I won't venture to guess how they conduct their classes. I can say with absolute certainty, though, that those I work with (from maintenance to administrators) all have the best interests in mind for the students. I love my students...and the opportunity to serve them when I can. I know my co-workers feel the same way. You should see some of the extents we've gone for students who are struggling. Even those who drop out and I see in stores, I still care for them, and I know-I KNOW- I am not the only one. That's why I said/say, Dr. Pan really must have believed in what she was doing. BUT, perhaps a better way to go about it would have been to ask the students if they would let her access their transcripts and show them to the accredidation board...? I have no clue. Hindsight is 20/20, no? Okay, God bless and goodnight...I mean that to all of you.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Hamjustice    - 3/11/2009 10:59:44 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Ham what would you say on this issue if we removed the FERPA violation. For the sake of a hypothetical argument where is this situation if Dr.Pan would have scrubed the names from her report? This is completly hypothetical. I am curious as to how you see this. I wouldn't call myself part of a blinded mob. I just have a problem with authority. Especially when that authority seems to be on a power trip. I only say that in response to the original charge that Dr. Pan was removed from her class room for. That was insubordination.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Reasonableguy    - 3/11/2009 10:45:31 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I mean 'not pursuing'...Getting late!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sensible    - 3/11/2009 10:30:15 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Now, come on Ham...the school is paying out the rest of her contract, the school is giving her another 10 g's, the school is continuing her other contractual benefits thru July, the school is pursuing their complaint against her witht he attorney general and the school is giving her a great letter of reference. Seems like the school is giving her a whole lot to keep her quiet. She'll have a new contract some where else and go on with her life. And lower standards will become the norm at MPCC...unless they actually lose their accreditation. Which will effect income and enrollment. Most 4 year colleges will only accept transfer credits if the two year college is acredidated.All Dr.Pan wanted was for the college to quit serving hamburger when they are advertising prime rib.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sensible    - 3/11/2009 10:28:55 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

A)Ah, never said I didn't work there, just said I wasn't an "administration flunky" which is the truth; B) "syncopath" is not even a word;C)If you re-read what I did say in the past I am sure she believed she thought what she was doing was right. I simply believe she should have held to the conduct she professed to believe in to be hired there. D)Trust me, my credibility is fine. I am not worried about what you think--the blinded mob so ready to skewer Dr. ChipPs (note the emphasis) and the MPCC Board and Administration. Really, it's over. She made her point (at the sake of her students), she receives the benefits of her contract until it runs out at the end of the school year, and $10,000. I still believe in protecting those who come to me for protection, and will continue to do so, whether or not the illiterate masses agree with me or not. Good night and blessings. :)
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Hamjustice    - 3/11/2009 10:18:30 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Or maybe its Chuck Salestrom throwing hisself of the sword of the college. Ouch.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by C/K babe    - 3/11/2009 10:01:22 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Well said mover-shaker, about time someone put Dr. Chip's best friend (or vice president) in his place. Haha.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by C/K babe    - 3/11/2009 10:00:23 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

You were called a "syncopath" Mr. Hamjustice because you refuse to consider that Dr. Pan was right. You have REJECTED her claims from the very first story without even a pause. That's why the rest of us on this website don't believe your claim that you DON'T work there. Why else would you accept the word of the administration without even a consideration that Dr. Pan was telling the TRUTH? We think you doth PROTEST too much. Your credibility is totally shot!!!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by mover-shaker    - 3/11/2009 9:56:47 PM
(0 current warnings - 7 warnings total)

oops..'english lesson' I guess I shouldn't try to type in the dark.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sensible    - 3/11/2009 9:46:10 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

That's right punkie, and she was given a letter of recommendation. Also neither party can speak badly of the other. I firmly believe that MPCC was more interested in shutting her up than seeing her prosecuted for anything. They don't want their dirty laundry hung out in public. And Hamjustice, thanks for the enblish lesson. You wouldn't happen to be a member of MPCC staff by chance?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sensible    - 3/11/2009 9:44:23 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Correct--I misspelled it. I will take you up on your offer to "(Check the spelling...)" Very good on this post--however, on other posts dealing with this story, may I suggest a few things? 1) Find out what a, "syncopath" is; 2) His name is spelled, "Dr. Chipps" not the abbreviated "Chips" you're fond of; 3)when claiming something is, "my friends experiences," you are saying it belonged to them, so you need to show possesion: my friend's experiences would be more appropriate. I guarantee you, I know many (if not all) of the departments at MPCC are NOT dumbing down. Thanks for the spelling tip, too! :)
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Hamjustice    - 3/11/2009 9:35:53 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

I have to say that I am proud of the NP Bulletin readers who are questioning this decision by Dr. Chipps. I think he should think long and hard about his decision. He is supposed to provide our students with the best teachers available. I have to wonder if his and other administrator's personal feelings about Deming didn't enter into this. If so, they are cheating our community just like they cheated the students and Deming Pan.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by C/K babe    - 3/11/2009 8:55:08 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

For those of you who believe MPCC is covering up their true motives and Dr. Pan was only trying to retain the integrity of the nursing and MLT programs, you can take action. You can stop the cover-up. Express your concerns to the accreditation commission by emailing them here - nlnac@nlnac.org.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Braskaman    - 3/11/2009 7:26:14 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

No, not a pittance. (Check the spelling Mr. Hamjustice.) She left with the most important thing of all, her integrity and dignity intact. I believe she did what she thought was right. I am proud of her. She can hold her head high knowing that her priorities were based on the students. I wonder if we can say the same of the administration of Mid Plains Community College. The sad part is, we may never know...
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by punkie    - 3/11/2009 6:54:40 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Fufilling her year contract and $10,000 isn't a "sweet deal," all things considered. A tenured prof leaving with what she got is pitance.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Hamjustice    - 3/11/2009 5:43:53 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

OK. So if Dr.Pan had violated a federal law and Chipps was right to fire her and the college is not 'dumbing down' their programs, why such a good settlement for Dr. Pan? Seems to me that the college was more worried about what Pan was going to say than the fact that she 'may have' violated FERPA. Only an organization with alot to hide would offer such a sweet deal. Dr.Pan knew that even if she won at the hearing MPCC would be a difficult place to work at afterwards. She would have been scrutinized and harrassed until she quit or they could fabricate some reason to let her go. I hope MPCC gets thoroughly investigated.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sensible    - 3/11/2009 5:13:54 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

If students are not getting the education required for their field, then dang right they shouldn't be hired. I think employers should know about the substandard education so they are not hiring anyone that may not know what they are doing. Looks like a lawsuit waiting to happen to me.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by ironmike    - 3/11/2009 5:06:22 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

This is a classic case of what happens to a whistleblower when they speak out. I read something recently about whistleblowers that said only about 20% who blow the whistle have favorable outcomes. That means 80% of those who speak out against wrongdoing get trampled and destroyed by whoever they are reporting on. Deming Pan spoke out about lowered academic standards and the college found a way to shut her up. They claim her charges are unfounded. I don’t believe them and the sad thing is we may never know the truth. What other chemistry teacher is going to take such a risk as to speak up now?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by npdood    - 3/11/2009 3:34:53 PM
(0 current warnings - 8 warnings total)

That's great she claims she didn't know, but all faculty is advised on FERPA, from full time to adjunct. Also, the staff process in obtaining transcripts for students says in the instructions, "Student transcripts and records are maintained in compliance with the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act, as amended in 1976 (PL 93-380, section 513 and PL 93-538, section 2) and Nebraska statutes 84-1201 through 84-1226." Also, the same argument applies to all who are thinking she was in the right by using the student's private transcripts--ot's okay for her to break the law for a greater good? FERPA isn't something MPCC made up. It's federal law.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Hamjustice    - 3/11/2009 3:27:16 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Readers,
I spoke with Dr. Deming Pan today and she wanted the readers of the North Platte Bulletin to know that she did not know she was violating FERPA regulations when she sent the material to the accreditation commission. Pan said schools are allowed to disclose records to specified others, including accreditation agencies. She said as a scientist, she thought she was only providing evidence of her charges of diminished academic standards. When she sent the student's transcripts, she believed she was within FERPA regulations, Pan said. Pan said she felt the agency needed to see that the cases she wrote them about were real. The school's position is that only administration officials can provide those records to a third party. Pan apologized to the school and to the board for her violation based on her misunderstanding of the law.
Thanks.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Frank Graham    - 3/11/2009 12:59:04 PM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

This so sad. I have never met Dr. Pan, but I can see she has been wrongly accused and paid to keep quiet. If she had not taken the deal and then spoken publically, the board would have destroyed her good reputation and future opportunities. Another case of "blackmail?" as in the Golden Spike and Shelly Harshaw?? And isn't it ironic that the Pedersons, Dave and Judy seem to involved? Hmmmm, the smell seems to be getting worse.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Friendly One    - 3/11/2009 12:37:06 PM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

You are right, reasonableguy. Dr. Pan had her reasons for taking the buyout. I wish she hadn't, but she did. That does not mean this issue of the standards or the accreditation is resolved. We need to keep after the college and the accreditation commission for some sort of resolution of this matter.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Ja Rule    - 3/11/2009 12:02:08 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Both my daughter and I are former students of NPCC. While there (03-05)I had a teacher who would lose student's assignments-usually in her office-and blame the student and another who ignored a student who was very obviously cheating by copying work of other student's. The teacher was told by several students and witnessed it herself, but did nothing. The student was graduated with a double major! This sort of thing goes on regularly and is ignored by the administration. The bottom line is that they want the numbers to look good to the state and the accredidation committee. My daughter had Dr. Pan and loved her. She was the first teacher who made an effort to make sure that her student understood the work. My daughter would have taken more classes from Dr. Pan if they had been available. She was and is an incredible teacher who is passinate about her students and chemistry. I-and my daughter-will always be gtateful for Dr. Pan. My daughter is an MLT and has been told by her supervisor that she wishes there were more like her. Many thanks to Dr. Pan and a big thumbs down for the college and the administration. wife of Seriously
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by SERIOUSLY!    - 3/11/2009 11:11:59 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Reasonableguy, what punishment? She was placed on leave until a hearing could be held. She was not denied her right to a hearing. She chose to terminate her contract and was given a glowing letter of recommendation. She wasn't prevented from obtaining new employment and she voluntarily accepted a settlement with severance. So what punishment exactly? Additionally, this is not the same thing as the example that you provided. Arresting a jaywalker and not giving them their day in court would be wrong, but the jaywalker would have the same opportunity Dr. Pan was given to present his side of the case and why he did what he did, which would temper the court's decision on how to punish him. Ignoring regulations meant to protect the very students you are claiming to protect by violating those regulations is specious and circular reasoning. And, more importantly, we don't know if those students that she submitted information on were actually performing at a substandard level. If they aren't can you imagine the impact that their information being leaked will have on their careers? The mere implication that they are not performing up to standard because of the MPCC qualification requirements could prevent them from being able to obtain employment in their field, a consequence that Dr. Pan is not being subjected to. So who is being punished here exactly?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by outsider II    - 3/11/2009 10:47:07 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

It says she saw a loseing battle. The board was going to get rid of her. the hearing was going to focus on her FERPA violation not what created the violation. Now the public focus has a better chance of staying on the issue she brought up instead of a mistake mad with the best intentions. sure say it "the road to hell is paved with good intentions." then what is the road to heaven paved with?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Reasonableguy    - 3/11/2009 10:41:53 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

That's the point, Reasonableguy ... it's what you've heard. I've heard all sorts of stuff too, but that doesn't make it true. I hope that the program isn't going down the hole, and I would hope that the college would strive to make MPCC the best that it can be, but I'm also not going to hold Dr. Pan up to be some saint when apparently there was some wrongoing on her part as well. And, again, if all the yap is true about MPCC spitting out people that are providing substandard care to those in ill health, what does it say about Dr. Pan, who sells out those folks' health as well for $10,000?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Northplatypus    - 3/11/2009 10:35:46 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

Hamjustice, Northplatypus and outsider, I am disturbed by your clinging to ideology in the face of a more serious problem. What you are saying is equivocal to supporting the imprisoning of a person for jaywalking who runs across a street to help someone in a traffic accident because the city is trying to lower the visibility of traffic accidents and any aid will only make accidents more visible. From what I have heard, and I admit there isn't a large amount of validity to it as it is only hearsay, Dr. Pan violated FERPA when she submitted her complaint to the Accreditation Agency. I am not saying that Dr.Pan wasn't in the wrong for not cleansing student names and information from her report. I am saying that the punishment in no way matches the crime. She didn't send the information to a media outlet, or sell it to a phone bank. She used it in an effort to raise the quality of education.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Reasonableguy    - 3/11/2009 10:13:42 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Thanks to those of you who agreed that rights were violated and people need to understand that FERPA is a federal law and is very serious. That being said, if Dr. Pan feels that things are not "up-to-snuff" at the college the accreditation (sp) board needs to be contacted with a grievance, the board needs to be addressed, etc. I think it's very sad to lose someone as qualified as she is. Losing someone like her is not going to help the program.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by intheno    - 3/11/2009 9:55:45 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

NPgrad89- I COMPLETELY agree with you! I was in the nursing program this year and was DISGUSTED with the way the program was organized. I had heard so many great things about the nursing program at MPCC, so I went back home to finish my degree. Mrs. C and Mrs. G were outstanding teachers from what I've heard from all my friends who graduated under them. In my class, we started out with 24 students, and since I've left the program in fear of not getting the education I deserve, they are left with 9....this obviously says something is going wrong. Dr. Pan was a WONDERFUL instructor and I am so thankful someone called out this college. She is more than right for being concerned for the safety of patients in the hospital because of inadequate education being taught to our nurses. This is the main reason I left...I feared I was not being taught the proper skills to gain any confidence in doing a very important and critical job. I'm continuing my nursing studies elsewhere, and I can honestly say I would not recommend the program for anyone who takes this field seriously.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by hello    - 3/11/2009 9:51:26 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I'm right here, and I am glad Northplatypus and outsider get why this was so ergregious. I would not want my doctor submitting my records to any agency without my permission. FERPA is in place for a reason--to protect the student. I've known women who have left their abusive relationships and tried to start their lives over at MPCC, and their abusive ex calls to the school looking for them. FERPA protects them. It is clearly spelled out in the employee manual what standard the staff are held to for a reason, and is downloadable at: www.mpcc.edu. If there is a lowering of standards, and that's a big IF, it is not department wide, and that is quantifiable. God bless all involved with this. I believe Dr. Pan thought what she was doing was, "for the greater good" but it should never have been at the expense of the students.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Hamjustice    - 3/11/2009 8:43:53 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

The decision by the College Board to buy out Dr. Pan's contract is not unusual for educational institutions or businesses. Time is money to them and they will settle to save money. I would remind you that citizens can attend the Board meetings just like people can attend City Council meetings. Visitors are allowed at specific times in the meeting to make comments. Of course, you can also write or call your representatives when you read about the meetings in the newspaper(s). I think people forget to give feedback to Board members and then they operate in vacuums. Hold the Board members accountable!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Agatha    - 3/11/2009 8:09:59 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Excellent point Outsider. I think the sharing of information is happening way to often in todays society. As far as lowering of standards, this is happening in way more classes than this single incident. The greed factor seems to override the quality factor in many cases. An instructor giving out A's works the same as hush money. Students are not likely to complain about a poorly taught class as long as they get a good grade.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sako    - 3/11/2009 7:21:43 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I use several......MPCC USED to have an outstanding nursing program. Now with Mrs. C and Mrs. G gone, it has gone to crap. I would be very interested in seeing the state board results when this years class graduates the program. I would bet you the shirt off my back that the failure rate skyrockets. I count myself lucky and blessed to have had the opportunity to learn from Mrs. Christensen....... Now with Deming Pan also gone, I don't see any way out of this mess. The dedication and integrity of the instructor is what determines the success of a program. Too bad the board doesn't see it that way and chose to let Pan go.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by NPgrad89    - 3/11/2009 7:01:31 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Regardless of whether or not she was right about the substandard teaching she claims is going on, she breached the privacy of these students and there is no indication that she had permission to do so. Whistle blower or not, we are all held to certain standards in our professions to protect the people we have power over. These rules aren't in place just because. They are there for a reason. And the fact that you have an axe to grind is not justification for violating rules and policies meant to protect the very students you are claiming to be helping. Would you be so generous with your compliments if this was a doctor airing your medical history because he disagreed with a drug company's policies?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by outsider II    - 3/11/2009 7:00:42 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

I'm going to play devil's advocate I know, but if there's some big conspiracy at the college to cover up a substandard program churning out substandard health care providers, then what's it say about Dr. Pan if she's willing to take $10,000 to simply brush it under the rug?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Northplatypus    - 3/11/2009 6:22:12 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

...and we wonder why our country, especially our education system is in such a mess! ACCOUNTABILITY, or lack thereof.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by ATC Alan    - 3/11/2009 5:39:58 AM
(0 current warnings - 4 warnings total)

Something fishy is going on here. One cover-up after another and the elected BOARD just keeps on letting Chipps pull the strings. When will they ever wake up? When OUR college SINKS?
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by sweetNE    - 3/11/2009 5:25:58 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Where is Mr. Hamjustise now? The college paid Dr. Pan to shut up. More than $43,000 to not speak out. Guess they got what they wanted eh? Wonder what they are hiding and we all wonder why you have not offered a defense today like usual? We all think MPCC and NPCC got caught guilty!!!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by punkie    - 3/11/2009 12:47:04 AM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Dr. Pan, we UNDERSTAND why you did what you did. We all support you. You had NO CHANCE against the administration and a board of directors who rubber stamp the administrators decisions. We can only HOPE that the board finally pays attention from now on and holds the administrators accountable!!! Think they take their responsibilities seriously? We'll see ...
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by npdood    - 3/11/2009 12:11:23 AM
(0 current warnings - 8 warnings total)

Just got home from my run. Seriously disappointed that Dr. Pan took the settlement that the college offered. My daughter LOVES Dr. Pan and credits her for the success she has achieved in the MLT program. She knew there were students not qualified in her classes and watched as Dr. Pan got them through. The lowered standards Dr. Pan talked about was a well known fact at NPCC. Everybody knew about it including students, faculties, employees, everyone!!! Even Chipps and the other administrators. SHAME on them for paying Dr. Pan off to STAY QUIET!!! We can only HOPE that the board of directors listened to her and will watch over our kid's futures. For me and a bunch of other parents, we have our doubts.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by npdood    - 3/11/2009 12:08:24 AM
(0 current warnings - 8 warnings total)

As the mother of two students at NPCC, I can only HOPE that the board listened to Dr. Pan and will get involved stop admins from dumbing down our students from now on!!!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by C/K babe    - 3/10/2009 11:36:33 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

This is so obvious!!! Deming Pan busted MPCC for lowering standards and Chips fired her when he found out. He fired her after the college came under fire from the nursing accredition committee. Chips and the other admins felt threatened so they got rid of the BEST chemistry professor they had. He was WRONG to fire her in the middle of a semester and realized it afterward. Chips and the board's only option was to pay Pan nearly $50,000 to shut up. Nice. Way to to admins and board. What a great way to run a college. Students first? I don't think so!!!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by C/K babe    - 3/10/2009 11:34:33 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

Whistle blowers like Dr. Pan tell the truth - they are crucified and destroyed professionally. Meanwhile, the powers that be continue to ruin the system and destroy the whistle blower, with the complete and utter acceptance of other who fear the same fate. We all applaud Dr. Pan for standing up to the administration and telling the truth about it, even though we couldn't support you publicy for fear of the same fate. How sad...
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by mover-shaker    - 3/10/2009 11:07:15 PM
(0 current warnings - 7 warnings total)

As someone who has a vested interest in NPCC, and many friends that are professors, I have a couple of points to make. Ja Rule is right, the college bought off Dr. Pan to keep her quiet. I doubt she even knew how much power she had should an open hearing occur. The administrators did, that's why they offered to pay her so much money to SHUT HER UP! I don't blame Dr. Pan for taking the college's and the taxpayer's money. But I HOPE the board LISTENED to her statement and will hold the administrators and program directors responsible from now on. This kind of thing happens to whistle blowers all the time.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by mover-shaker    - 3/10/2009 11:03:08 PM
(0 current warnings - 7 warnings total)

So the college will pay Dr. Pan for the rest of the semester plus $10,000 severance, plus pay 3 others to replace her, and has lost an obviously well qualified, extremely popular, tenured professor and says it has "addressed the issue?" I am happy for Dr. Pan, but I am left wondering about MPCC's standards. I also wonder about the dude who says the administration handled this situation well. As a taxpayer, former student and occasional medical patient, I beg to differ on that one! I understand why Dr. Pan took the settlement, but I am glad the Bulletin didn't. Don't let this story drop, Frank!
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by Ja Rule    - 3/10/2009 10:50:03 PM
(0 current warnings - 0 warnings total)

The issue that needs addressed here is, of course, the quality of education being delivered to the students of NPCC. Board members, this is your paramount duty. to ensure that the students of NPCC recieve the highest quality education possible. The nursing program at NPCC is historically one of the strongest, if not THE strongest, among the community colleges in the state. This should not be lessened. Board members need to make sure this continues. I am unsettled about how this has been handled. The board, Dr. Chipps, and others need to take a look at how this all came to be and make sure that NPCC lives up to its mission. It is a very important component in the quality of life we enjoy. Let's keep it the best.
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by I use several    - 3/10/2009 8:58:54 PM
(0 current warnings - 2 warnings total)

Great job NP and NPCC! Bought off another person trying to make a change for the better. The NPCC board should be ashamed of itself as should the people running the show at the "Spike".
Report Talk Back AbusePosted by bigcity    - 3/10/2009 6:06:25 PM
(0 current warnings - 8 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back

Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 


Copyright © 2003 - 2010 northplattebulletin.com
All rights reserved.

Flatrock Publishing, Inc.
1300 E 4th St., Suite F
North Platte, NE 69101

 
Your Ip Address - 38.107.191.110
North Platte, Nebraska